1 resultado para Construction of knowledge
em University of Washington
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (15)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (19)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (74)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (32)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (74)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (47)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (19)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (44)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (12)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (13)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (96)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (149)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
Knowledge organization in the networked environment is guided by standards. Standards in knowledge organization are built on principles. For example, NISO Z39.19-1993 Guide to the Construction of Monolingual Thesauri (now undergoing revision) and NISO Z39.85- 2001 Dublin Core Metadata Element Set are two standards used in many implementations. Both of these standards were crafted with knowledge organization principles in mind. Therefore it is standards work guided by knowledge organization principles which can affect design of information services and technologies. This poster outlines five threads of thought that inform knowledge organization principles in the networked environment. An understanding of each of these five threads informs system evaluation. The evaluation of knowledge organization systems should be tightly linked to a rigorous understanding of the principles of construction. Thus some foundational evaluation questions grow from an understanding of stan dard s and pr inciples: on what pr inciples is this know ledge organization system built? How well does this implementation meet the ideal conceptualization of those principles? How does this tool compare to others built on the same principles?