2 resultados para variação de microhabitats
em University of Queensland eSpace - Australia
Resumo:
1. The often complex architecture of coral reefs forms a diversity of light microhabitats. Analogous to patterns in forest plants, light variation may drive strategies for efficient light utilization and metabolism in corals. 2. We investigated the spatial distribution of light regimes in a spur-and-groove reef environment and examine the photophysiology of the coral Montipora monasteriata (Forskal 1775), a species with a wide habitat distribution. Specifically, we examined the variation in tissue and skeletal thickness, and photosynthetic and metabolic responses among contrasting light microhabitats. 3. Daily irradiances reaching corals in caves and under overhangs were 1-5 and 30-40% of those in open habitats at similar depth (3-5 m), respectively. Daily rates of net photosynthesis of corals in cave habitats approximated zero, suggesting more than two orders of magnitude variation in scope for growth across habitats. 4. Three mechanisms of photoadaptation or acclimation were observed in cave and overhang habitats: (1) a 20-50% thinner tissue layer and 40-60% thinner skeletal plates, maximizing light interception per unit mass; (2) a two- to threefold higher photosynthetic efficiency per unit biomass; and (3) low rates of dark respiration. 5. Specimens from open and cave habitats displayed a high capacity to acclimate to downshifts or upshifts in irradiance, respectively. However, specimens in caves displayed limited acclimation to further irradiance reduction, indicating that these live near their irradiance limit. 6. Analogous to patterns for some plant species in forest gaps, the morphological plasticity and physiological flexibility of M. monasteriata enable it to occupy light habitats that vary by more than two orders of magnitude.
Resumo:
The terrestrial carnivorous bladderwort, Utricularia uliginosa Vahl. (Lentibulariaceae) was studied to determine the species assemblage present in traps of these plants in situ across four sites over 15 months. The immediate soil environment was also sampled to determine the fauna present, and to compare the fauna present in traps with the fauna in the environment. The soil fauna consisted of 10 taxon types, which occupied either pelagic, epibenthic or interstitial microhabitats. All were found in traps of U. uliginosa, with the main prey being interstitial taxa followed by epibenthic and occasionally pelagic taxa. Numbers of individuals of the two most abundant soil taxa (nematodes, Elaphoidella) varied independently across the four sites over the 15 months of the study, as did numbers of Elaphoidella in the traps of U. uliginosa. Numbers of nematodes in the traps of U. uliginosa showed significant differences among sites, but not differences among times. Comparison of the trap fauna with the soil fauna revealed differences in relative abundance between soil samples and trap samples for two of the three taxa examined. There was an under-representation of nematodes in the traps relative to numbers in surrounding soil. There was an over-representation of the copepod Elaphoidella in the traps of U. uliginosa relative to numbers in soil at some of the times of sampling. Acarina were equally abundant in soil and trap samples. The patterns observed for Elaphoidella and nematodes may be due to selectivity in trapping by U. uliginosa, and/or differences in digestibility of the prey. Elaphoidella individuals were found to be attracted to U. uliginosa in a behavioural experiment. This may contribute to the over-representation of Elaphoidella in the traps of U. uliginosa in the field.