RNA interference against human papillomavirus oncogenes in cervical cancer cells results in increased sensitivity to cisplatin

Targeted inhibition of oncogenes in tumor cells is a rational approach toward the development of cancer therapies based on RNA interference (RNAi). Tumors caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are an ideal model system for RNAi-based cancer therapies because the oncogenes that cause cervical cancer, E6 and E7, are expressed only in cancerous cells. We investigated whether targeting HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes yields cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy by cisplatin, the chemotherapeutic agent currently used for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. We have designed siRNAs directed against the HPV E6 oncogene that simultaneously targets both E6 and E7, which results in an 80% reduction in E7 protein and reactivation of the p53 pathway. The loss of E6 and E7 resulted in a reduction in cellular viability concurrent with the induction of cellular senescence. Interference was specific in that no effect on HPV-negative cells was observed. We demonstrate that RNAi against E6 and E7 oncogenes enhances the chemotherapeutic effect of cisplatin in HeLa cells. The IC50 for HeLa cells treated with cisplatin was 9.4 mu M, but after the addition of a lentivirus-delivered shRNA against E6, the IC50 was reduced almost 4-fold to 2.4 mu M. We also observed a decrease in E7 expression with a concurrent increase in p53 protein levels upon cotreatment with shRNA and cisplatin over that seen with individual treatment alone. Our results provide strong evidence that loss of E6 and E7 results in increased sensitivity to cisplatin, probably because of increased p53 levels.

A side order of stem cells: The SP phenotype

A defining property of murine hematopoietic stein cells (HSCs) is low fluorescence after staining with Hoechst 33342 and Rhodamine 123. These dyes have proven to be remarkably powerful tools in the purification and characterization of HSCs when used alone or in combination with antibodies directed against stem cell epitopes. Hoechst low cells are described as side population (SP) cells by virtue of their typical profiles in Hoechst red versus Hoechst blue bivariate fluorescent-activated cell sorting dot plots. Recently, excitement has been generated by the findings that putative stem cells from solid tissues may also possess this SP phenotype. SP cells have now been isolated from a wide variety of mammalian tissues based on this same dye efflux phenomenon, and in many cases this cell population has been shown to contain apparently multipotent stem cells. What is yet to be clearly addressed is whether cell fusion accounts for this perceived SP multipotency. Indeed, if low fluorescence after Hoechst staining is a phenotype shared by hematopoietic and organ-specific stem cells, do all resident tissue SP cells have bone marrow origins or might the SP phenotype be a property common to all stem cells? Subject to further analysis, the SP phenotype may prove invaluable for the initial isolation of resident tissue stem cells in the absence of definitive cell-surface markers and may have broad-ranging applications in stem cell biology, from the purification of novel stem cell populations to the development of autologous stem cell therapies.

Cell surface expression of urokinase receptor in normal mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer cell lines

Background: The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is important in the process of extracellular matrix degradation occurring during cancer cell invasion and metastasis. We wished to quantify uPAR on the surfaces of normal mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) and 6 well-known breast cancer cell lines using flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Cell surface uPAR was labelled with a monoclonal antibody, and this was detected with a florescent-labelled second antibody and accurately measured using flow cytometry. The measured fluorescent signals of the stained cells were interpolated with those of Quantum Simply Cellular bead standards to determine the number of uPAR sites per cell. Results: The breast cancer cell lines ranged from 13,700 to 50,800 uPAR sites per cell, whilst HMEC cells had only 2,500 sites. Conclusions: This simple and reliable method showed that the expression of cell surface uPAR is higher in the breast cancer cell lines than in the normal mammary cells.