Assessing facial approximation accuracy: How do resemblance ratings of disparate faces compare to recognition tests?

In the past, the accuracy of facial approximations has been assessed by resemblance ratings (i.e., the comparison of a facial approximation directly to a target individual) and recognition tests (e.g., the comparison of a facial approximation to a photo array of faces including foils and a target individual). Recently, several research studies have indicated that recognition tests hold major strengths in contrast to resemblance ratings. However, resemblance ratings remain popularly employed and/or are given weighting when judging facial approximations, thus indicating that no consensus has been reached. This study aims to further investigate the matter by comparing the results of resemblance ratings and recognition tests for two facial approximations which clearly differed in their morphological appearance. One facial approximation was constructed by an experienced practitioner privy to the appearance of the target individual (practitioner had direct access to an antemortem frontal photograph during face construction), while the other facial approximation was constructed by a novice under blind conditions. Both facial approximations, whilst clearly morphologically different, were given similar resemblance scores even though recognition test results produced vastly different results. One facial approximation was correctly recognized almost without exception while the other was not correctly recognized above chance rates. These results suggest that resemblance ratings are insensitive measures of the accuracy of facial approximations and lend further weight to the use of recognition tests in facial approximation assessment. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Effect of sequence variation in Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich protein 2 on binding of specific monoclonal antibodies: Implications for rapid diagnostic tests for malaria

This Article Right arrow Full Text Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Right arrow Supplemental material Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted Services Right arrow Similar articles in this journal Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal Right arrow Download to citation manager Right arrow Reprints and Permissions Right arrow Copyright Information Right arrow Books from ASM Press Right arrow MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Right arrow Articles by Lee, N. Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, J. Right arrow Search for Related Content PubMed Right arrow PubMed Citation Right arrow Articles by Lee, N. Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, J. Right arrow Pubmed/NCBI databases * Substance via MeSH Previous Article | Next Article Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2006, p. 2773-2778, Vol. 44, No. 8 0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02557-05 Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Effect of Sequence Variation in Plasmodium falciparum Histidine- Rich Protein 2 on Binding of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies: Implications for Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria{dagger} Nelson Lee,1,2 Joanne Baker,2 Kathy T. Andrews,1 Michelle L. Gatton,1,3 David Bell,4 Qin Cheng,2,3 and James McCarthy1* Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition, Queensland Institute of Medical Research and School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia,1 Department of Drug Resistance and Diagnostics, Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Australia,2 Malaria Drug Resistance and Chemotherapy, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Queensland, Australia,3 World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines4 Received 8 December 2005/ Returned for modification 23 February 2006/ Accepted 26 May 2006 The ability to accurately diagnose malaria infections, particularly in settings where laboratory facilities are not well developed, is of key importance in the control of this disease. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) offer great potential to address this need. Reports of significant variation in the field performance of RDTs based on the detection of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) (PfHRP2) and of significant sequence polymorphism in PfHRP2 led us to evaluate the binding of four HRP2-specific monoclonal antibodies (MABs) to parasite proteins from geographically distinct P. falciparum isolates, define the epitopes recognized by these MABs, and relate the copy number of the epitopes to MAB reactivity. We observed a significant difference in the reactivity of the same MAB to different isolates and between different MABs tested with single isolates. When the target epitopes of three of the MABs were determined and mapped onto the peptide sequences of the field isolates, significant variability in the frequency of these epitopes was observed. These findings support the role of sequence variation as an explanation for variations in the performance of HRP2-based RDTs and point toward possible approaches to improve their diagnostic sensitivities