1 resultado para court delay
em University of Queensland eSpace - Australia
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Archive of European Integration (78)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (63)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (18)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (38)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (55)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (10)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (26)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (18)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (73)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (120)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (117)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (27)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (9)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (38)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
Resumo:
The overriding philosophy of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 in Queensland is to facilitate the just and expeditious resolution of the issues in a civil proceeding at minimum expense. The court is enjoined to apply the rules to avoid undue delay, expense and technicality. Parties impliedly undertake to the court and each other to proceed expeditiously. These rules adopt management theories developed to contain delay and cost in the civil justice system. A survey was designed to determine whether the overriding objective is being achieved in practice. The results indicate a reduction in the time from initiation of a proceeding to termination as compared to a sample of similar cases determined under the repealed Rules of the Supreme Court.