Perforated corneal hydrops treated with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas and tissue adhesive

Purpose: To report a case of a perforated acute hydrops in a mentally retarded patient that was successfully managed with intracameral sulfur hexafluoride gas and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Methods: Interventional case report. Results: A 14-year-old mentally retarded male patient with keratoconus presented with a perforated acute hydrops. A bandage contact lens was applied. However, following a large emesis 2 days later, the aqueous leak worsened with shallowing of the anterior chamber. Under general anesthesia, sulfur hexafluoride was injected to reform the anterior chamber and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive was applied to the perforated site and covered by a bandage contact lens and temporary tarsorrhaphy. A follow-up examination at 1 month showed a formed anterior chamber with tissue adhesive in situ and no aqueous leak. Conclusions: The successful use of intracameral sulfur hexafluoride and tissue adhesive in the management of perforated acute hydrops may avoid emergency tectonic penetrating keratoplasty and reduce potential complications in the poorly cooperative patient.

Protease IV production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the lungs of adults with cystic fibrosis

Protease IV is important in the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced microbial keratitis, but little is known of its role in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infection. In this study protease IV production was examined in 43 P. aeruginosa isolates (24 non-clonal and 19 clonal) from the lungs of chronically infected adult patients attending the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital CF Clinic, Sydney, Australia. Overall, 32/43 (74 %) isolates were positive for protease IV protein by Western blotting and 22/43 (51 %) had evidence of active protease IV on gelatin zymography. Clonal strains were 1.6 times more likely than non-clonal strains to produce protease IV [18/19 (95 %) versus 14/24 (58 %), RR=1.6, CI 1.1–2.3, P=0.007] and 3 times more likely to secrete the protein [16/19 (84 %) versus 6/24 (25 %), RR=3.4, CI 1.6–6.9, P