Chronic rhinosinusitis and eosinophils: do macrolides have an effect?

Purpose of review: Long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy is effective in the treatment of chronic airway inflammation. It is believed that macrolide antibiotics produce this benefit through an antiinflammatory effect that is separate from their antibiotic effect. Eosinophils are key mediators in the inflammation seen in chronic rhinosinusitis. This review discusses the effect of macrolides on eosinophilic inflammation. Recent findings: In vitro studies recently have suggested that macrolides increase eosinophil apoptosis and reduce production of eosinophil chemotactic cytokines and adhesion molecules. In vivo studies have shown a reduction in eosinophil count and activity in asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. Clinical response to macrolide treatment is thought to be less likely in patients with atopy. Summary: In contrast to the evidence supporting the effect of macrolides on neutrophilic inflammation, there are limited data to suggest an influence on eosinophilic inflammation. For this reason, patients with prominent eosinophilic inflammation may in the future be identified as being less likely to respond to treatment. Further in vitro and clinical studies are required to investigate this subject.

Variance components analyses of multiple asthma traits in a large sample of Australian families ascertained through a twin proband

Background: Intermediate phenotypes are often measured as a proxy for asthma. It is largely unclear to what extent the same set of environmental or genetic factors regulate these traits. Objective: Estimate the environmental and genetic correlations between self-reported and clinical asthma traits. Methods: A total of 3073 subjects from 802 families were ascertained through a twin proband. Traits measured included self-reported asthma, airway histamine responsiveness (AHR), skin prick response to common allergens including house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus [D. pter]), baseline lung function, total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophilia. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of eight traits were performed with adjustment for ascertainment and significant covariates. Results: Overall 2716 participants completed an asthma questionnaire and 2087 were clinically tested, including 1289 self-reported asthmatics (92% previously diagnosed by a doctor). Asthma, AHR, markers of allergic sensitization and eosinophilia had significant environmental correlations with each other (range: 0.23-0.89). Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) showed low environmental correlations with most traits. Fewer genetic correlations were significantly different from zero. Phenotypes with greatest genetic similarity were asthma and atopy (0.46), IgE and eosinophilia (0.44), AHR and D. pter (0.43) and AHR and airway obstruction (-0.43). Traits with greatest genetic dissimilarity were FEV1 and atopy (0.05), airway obstruction and IgE (0.07) and FEV1 and D. pter (0.11). Conclusion: These results suggest that the same set of environmental factors regulates the variation of many asthma traits. In addition, although most traits are regulated to great extent by specific genetic factors, there is still some degree of genetic overlap that could be exploited by multivariate linkage approaches.