Toxicological aspects of treatment to remove cyanobacterial toxins from drinking water determined using the heterozygous P53 transgenic mouse model

The presence of toxic cyanobacteria in drinking water reservoirs renders the need to develop treatment methods for the 'safe' removal of their associated toxins. Chlorine has been shown to successfully remove a range of cyanotoxins including microcystins, cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxins. Each cyanotoxin requires specific treatment parameters, particularly solution pH and free chlorine residual. However, currently there has not been any investigation into the toxicological effect of solutions treated for the removal of these cyanotoxins by chlorine. Using the P53(def) transgenic mouse model mate and female C57BL/6J hybrid mice were used to investigate potential cancer inducing effects from such oral dosing solutions. Both purified cyanotoxins and toxic cell-free extract cyanobacterial solutions were chlorinated and administered over 90 and 170 days (respectively) in drinking water. No increase in cancer was found in any treatment. The parent cyanotoxins, microcystins, cylindrospermopsin and saxitoxins were readily removed by chlorine. There was no significant increase in the disinfection byproducts trihalomethanes or haloacetic acids, levels found were well below guideline values. Histological examination identified no effect of treatment solutions except male mice treated with chlorinated cylindrospermopsin (as a cell free extract). In this instance 40% of males were found to have fatty vacuolation in their livers, cause unknown. It is recommended that further toxicology be undertaken on chlorinated cyanobacterial solutions, particularly for non-genotoxic carcinogenic compounds, for example the Tg. AC transgenic mouse model. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Environmental contamination of arsenic and its toxicological impact on humans

Inorganic arsenic compounds are known carcinogens. The human epidemiologic evidence of arsenic-induced skin, lung, and bladder cancers is strong. However, the evidence of arsenic carcinogenicity in animals is very limited. Lack of a suitable animal model until recent years has inhibited studies of the mechanism of arsenic carcinogenesis. The toxicity and bioavailability of arsenic depend on its solubility and chemical forms. Therefore, it is critical to be able to measure arsenic speciation accurately and reliably. However, speciation of arsenic in more complex matrices remains a real challenge. There are tens of millions of people who are being exposed to excessive levels of arsenic in the drinking water alone. The source of contamination is mainly of natural origin and the mass poisoning is occurring worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Chronic arsenicosis resulting in cancer and non-cancer diseases will impact significantly on the public health systems in their respective countries. Effective watershed management and remediation technologies in addition to medical treatment are urgently needed in order to avoid what has been regarded as the largest calamity of chemical poisoning in the world.

Limitations on bioassays in macronutrient deficiency determination

Short-term nutrient bioassays can be used to assess labile nutrient availability in soils. These bioassays rely on a high number of plants and small soil volumes to exploit labile soil resources rapidly and assess potential nutrient deficiency. A comparison of the Neubauer bioassay with conventional pot trial assessment of P and S availability in a Yellow Kurosol was undertaken. Changes in labile soil nutrients and enzyme activity after bioassay assessment were also measured. The Neubauer bioassay was able to detect increased labile P availability following P fertiliser application to the soil. This corresponded with response to added P in a longer-term pot trial using maize. As expected, phosphatase activity increased following the bioassay and labile P was depleted by the plants. However, although a longer-term pot trial demonstrated the Yellow Kurosol was responsive to S fertilisation, labile S pools were sufficiently large that the short-term Neubauer bioassay detected no difference in S availability to plants. Both soil sulphatase activity and labile soil S were elevated following the bioassay. The short period of contact between the roots of the bioassay and the soil may have limited S uptake and therefore the ability of the bioassay to identify a S responsive soil. When using bioassay techniques to assess labile nutrient availability, it is critical that the size of the labile nutrient pool present be considered for each element, and that the period of contact between the bioassay and soil being tested is long enough for plant uptake to lower the nutrient supply to a level that limits further uptake.