A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing CD-34Selected Versus Unmanipulated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe, Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective. Evidence from animal studies, case reports, and phase I studies suggests that hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear, however, if depletion of T cells in the stem cell product infused after high-dose chemotherapy is beneficial in prolonging responses by reducing the number of infused autoreactive T cells. This pilot multicenter, randomized trial was undertaken to obtain feasibility data on whether CD34 selection (as a form of T cell depletion) of an autologous stem cell graft is of benefit in the HSCT procedure in patients with severe, refractory RA. Methods. Thirty-three patients with severe RA who had been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate and at least 1 other disease-modifying agent were enrolled in the trial. The patients received high-dose immunosuppressive treatment with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide followed by an infusion of autologous stem cells that were CD34 selected or unmanipulated. Safety, efficacy (based on American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria), and time to recurrence of disease were assessed on a monthly basis for up to 12 months. Results. All patients were living at the end of the study, with no major unexpected toxicities. Overall, on an intent-to-treat basis, ACR 20% response (ACR20) was achieved in 70% of the patients. An ACR70 response was attained in 27.7% of the 18 patients who had received CD34-selected cells and 53.3% of the 15 who had received unmanipulated cells (P = 0.20). The median time to disease recurrence was 147 days in the CD34-selected cell group and 201 days in the unmanipulated cell group (P = 0.28). There was no relationship between CD4 lymphopenia and response, but 72% of rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients had an increase in RF titer prior to recurrence of disease. Conclusion. HSCT can be performed safely in patients with RA, and initial results indicate significant responses in patients with severe, treatment-resistant disease. Similar outcomes were observed in patients undergoing HSCT with unmanipulated cells and those receiving CD34-selected cells. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in severe rheumatoid arthritis: A report from the EBMT and ABMTR

Objective. Since 1996, autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used to treat severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, published reports have been individual cases or series containing small numbers. This study combined the worldwide experience in a single analysis. Methods. The Autoimmune Disease Databases of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTR) were used to identify patients with RA treated with autologous HSCT. Further information relating to patient and treatment-specific variables was obtained by questionnaire. Results. Seventy-six patients were registered from 15 centers. Seventy-three patients had received autologous HSCT, and in 3 patients hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) were mobilized but not transplanted. Transplanted patients (median age 42 yrs, 74% female, 86% rheumatoid factor positive) had been previously treated with a mean of 5 (range 2-9) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). Significant functional impairment was present, with a median Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score of 1.4 (range 1.1-2.0) and Steinbrocker score mean 2.39 (SD 0.58). The high dose treatment regimen was cyclophosphamide (CYC) alone in the majority of patients, mostly 200 mg/kg (n = 62). Seven patients received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in addition to CYC, 2 patients busulfan and CYC (BuCYC), and one patient CYC with total body irradiation and ATG. One patient received fludarabine with ATG. Following treatment, one patient received bone marrow but the rest received chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. The harvest was unmanipulated in 28 patients, the rest receiving some form of lymphocyte depletion, mostly through CD34+ selection. Median followup was 16 months (range 3-55). Responses were measured using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Forty-nine patients (67%) achieved at least ACR 50% response at some point following transplant. There was a significant reduction in the level of disability measured by the HAQ (p < 0.005). Most patients restarted DMARD within 6 months for persistent or recurrent disease activity, which provided disease control in about half the cases. Response was significantly related to seronegative RA (p = 0.02) but not to duration of disease, number of previous DMARD, presence of HLA-DR4, or removal of lymphocytes from the graft. There was no direct transplant related mortality, although one patient, treated with the BuCYC regimen, died 5 months post-transplant from infection and incidental non-small cell lung cancer. Conclusion. Autologous HSCT is a relatively safe form of salvage treatment in severe, resistant RA. In these open label studies significant responses were achieved in most patients, with over 50% achieving an ACR 50 or more response at 12 months. Although the procedure is not curative, recurrent or persistent disease activity may be subsequently controlled in some patients with DMARD. Clinical trials are necessary to develop this approach inpatients with aggressive disease who have failed conventional treatment including anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.

Differentiated dendritic cells expressing nuclear RelB are predominantly located in rheumatoid synovial tissue perivascular mononuclear cell aggregates

Objective. Differentiated dendritic cells (DC) and other antigen-presenting cells are characterized by the nuclear location of RelB, a member of the nuclear factor kappa B/Rel family. To characterize and enumerate differentiated DC in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) peripheral blood (PB), synovial fluid (SF), and synovial tissue (ST), the expression and location of RelB were examined. Methods. RelB protein expression and cellular location were determined in RA PB, SF, and ST by flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analysis of purified cells or formalin-fixed tissue. DNA-binding activity of RelB was determined by electrophoretic: mobility shift-Western immunoblotting assays. Results. Circulating RA PBDC resembled normal immature PBDC in that they did not express intracellular RelB protein. In RA ST serial sections, cells containing nuclear RelB (nRelB) were enriched in perivascular regions. A mean +/- SD of 84 +/- 10% of these cells were DC. The remaining nRelB+,HLA-DR+ cells comprised B cells and macrophages. Only 3% of sorted SFDC contained nRelB, However, RelB present in the nucleus of these SFDC was capable of binding DNA, and therefore capable of transcriptional activity. Conclusion. Circulating DC precursors differentiate and express RelB after entry into rheumatoid ST. Differentiated DC can thus be identified by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed ST. Signals for DC maturation may differ between RA ST and SF, resulting in nuclear location of RelB predominantly in ST. This is likely to have functional consequences for the DC in these sites.

Could endogenous self-peptides presented by dendritic cells initiate rheumatoid arthritis?

The critical interaction initiating and perhaps perpetuating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the presentation of arthritogenic antigen to autoreactive T cells. In contrast to many organ-specific autoimmune diseases, no candidate autoantigens have yet been confirmed for RA. Here, Ranjeny Thomas and Peter Lipsky examine the role of dendritic cells in autoimmune disease, leading to the hypothesis that activation of T cells by endogenous self-peptides may be sufficient to initiate RA.

Association of clinical, radiological and synovial immunopathological responses to anti-rheumatic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives. To compare immunohistochemical scoring with clinical scoring and radiology for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, synovial tissue (ST) biopsied arthroscopically was assessed from 18 patients before and after commencement of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. Methods. Lymphocytes, macrophages, differentiated dendritic cells (DC), vascularity, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha and interleukin-1 beta levels were scored. Clinical status was scored using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set and serial radiographs were scored using the Larsen and Sharp methods. Histopathological evidence of activity included infiltration by lymphocytes, DC, macrophages. tissue vascularity, and expression of lining and sublining TNF alpha. These indices co-varied across the set of ST biopsies and were combined as a synovial activity score for each biopsy. Results. The change in synovial activity with treatment correlated with the ACR clinical response and with decreased radiological progression by the Larsen score, The ACR response to DMARD therapy. the change in synovial activity score and the slowing of radiological progression were each greatest in patients with high initial synovial vascularity. Conclusions. The data demonstrate an association between clinical, radiological and synovial immunopathological responses to anti-rheumatic treatment in RA. High ST vascularity may predict favourable clinical and radiological responses to treatment.

Inter-relationships between rheumatoid arthritis and periodontal disease

This review considers the considerable similarities between periodontal disease and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the etiology of these two diseases may differ, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms are remarkably similar and it is possible that individuals manifesting both periodontitis and RA may suffer from a unifying underlying systemic dysregulation of the inflammatory response. In light of these findings, the implications for the use of disease-modifying medications in the management of these two chronic inflammatory conditions is apparent. Further longitudinal studies and medication-based intervention studies are required to determine just how closely these two conditions are allied.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors

The cytokine, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of many chronic inflammatory and rheumatic diseases, in particular, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. Controlled trials have shown that the TNF inhibitors (etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab) significantly reduce symptoms and signs, improve function and quality of life, and reduce radiologically evident damage in patients with rheumatoid diseases. For reasons that are not entirely clear, etanercept does not work in Crohn's disease. Injection site and intravenous reactions and increased risk of infection (in particular, reactivation of tuberculosis) are associated with the use of these agents. Increased risk of lymphoproliferative disease, the development of lupus-like syndromes and demyelination, including optic neuritis and reactivation of multiple sclerosis, are under evaluation in long-term follow-up studies. The TNF inhibitors are expensive (about $18000 per year), and in some patients need to be given continuously to maintain benefit, even in the presence of other immunosuppressive therapy.

Periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis: A review

Periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) appear to share many pathologic features. In this review, the common pathologic mechanisms of these two common chronic conditions are explored. Emerging evidence now suggests a strong relationship between the extent and severity of periodontal disease and RA. While this relationship is unlikely to be causal, it is clear that individuals with advanced RA are more likely to experience more significant periodontal problems compared to their non-RA counterparts, and vice versa. A case is made that these two diseases could be very closely related through common underlying dysfunction of fundamental inflammatory mechanisms. The nature of such dysfunction is still unknown. Nonetheless, there is accruing evidence to support the notion that both conditions manifest as a result of an imbalance between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. As a result, new treatment strategies are expected to emerge for both diseases that may target the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and destructive proteases. The clinical implications of the current data dictate that patients with RA should be carefully screened for their periodontal status.

Complement factor 5a as a therapeutic target

The complement system is an innate immune defense mechanism that protects the host from infection and injury. Complement activation results in the formation of anaphylatoxins, including the biologically active protein C5a. This anaphylatoxin is a potent chemotactic agent for immune and inflammatory cells and induces cell activation. In situations of excessive or uncontrolled complement activation, the overproduction of C5a can cause deleterious effects to the host, and this process is implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous immunoinflammatory disease states, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, ischemia-reperfusion injuries and others. The presence of C5a in a wide variety of condition's has prompted many groups to examine the potential of inhibiting this complement activation product, with the aim of controlling these diseases and reducing the pathologic process. However, to date there is no clinically available specific C5a inhibitor and development of this new drug class is still in a relatively early stage, although limited phase I and phase II human clinical trials have been undertaken in the last few years with selected agents. In this review, examination of the current evidence supporting a specific role of C5a in selected disease states and an overview of potential therapeutic C5a inhibitors will enable the critical evaluation of the potential for C5a as a therapeutic target.

Early combination disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment for rheumatoid arthritis

Most people presenting with rheumatoid arthritis today can expect to achieve disease suppression, can avoid or substantially delay joint damage and deformities, and can maintain a good quality of life. Optimal management requires early diagnosis and treatment, usually with combinations of conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). If these do not effect remission, biological DMARDs may be beneficial. Lack of recognition of the early signs of rheumatoid arthritis, ignorance of the benefits of early application of modern treatment regimens, and avoidable delays in securing specialist appointments may hinder achievement of best outcomes for many patients. Triage for recognising possible early rheumatoid arthritis must begin in primary care settings with the following pattern of presentation as a guide: involvement of three or more joints; early-morning joint stiffness of greater than 30 minutes; or bilateral squeeze tenderness at metacarpophalangeal or metatarsophalangeal joints.

RANKL protein is expressed at the pannus-bone interface at sites of articular bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives. Receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) have been demonstrated to be critical regulators of osteoclast generation and activity. In addition, RANKL has been implicated as an important mediator of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the expression of RANKL and OPG at sites of pannus invasion into bone has not been examined. The present study was undertaken to further elucidate the contribution of this cytokine system to osteoclastogenesis and subsequent bone erosion in RA by examining the pattern of protein expression for RANKL, OPG and the receptor activator of NF-kappa B (RANK) in RA at sites of articular bone erosion. Methods. Tissues from 20 surgical procedures from 17 patients with RA were collected as discarded materials. Six samples contained only synovium or tenosynovium remote from bone, four samples contained pannus-bone interface with adjacent synovium and 10 samples contained both synovium remote from bone and pannu-bone interface with adjacent synovium. Immunohistochemistry was used to characterize the cellular pattern of RANKL, RANK and OPG protein expression immediately adjacent to and remote from sites of bone erosion. Results. Cellular expression of RANKL protein was relatively restricted in the bone microenvironment; staining was focal and confined largely to sites of osteoclast-mediated erosion at the pannus-bone interface and at sites of subchondral bone erosion. RANK-expressing osteoclast precursor cells were also present in these sites. OPG protein expression was observed in numerous cells in synovium remote from bone but was more limited at sites of bone erosion, especially in regions associated with RANKL expression. Conclusions. The pattern of RANKL and OPG expression and the presence of RANK-expressing osteoclast precursor cells at sites of bone erosion in RA contributes to the generation of a local microenvironment that favours osteoclast differentiation and activity. These data provide further evidence implicating RANKL in the pathogenesis of arthritis-induced joint destruction.