Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision-making

In this study, we test the interactive effect on ethical decision-making of (1) personal characteristics, and (2) personal expectancies based on perceptions of organizational rewards and punishments. Personal characteristics studied were cognitive moral development and belief in a just world. Using an in-basket simulation, we found that exposure to reward system information influenced managers' outcome expectancies. Further, outcome expectancies and belief in a just world interacted with managers' cognitive moral development to influence managers' ethical decision-making. In particular, low-cognitive moral development managers who expected that their organization condoned unethical behavior made less ethical decisions while high cognitive moral development managers became more ethical in this environment. Low cognitive moral development managers also behaved less ethically when their belief in a just world was high.

The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement

In this article, we review recent modifications to Jeffrey Gray's (1973, 1991) reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST), and attempt to draw implications for psychometric measurement of personality traits. First, we consider Gray and McNaughton's (2000) functional revisions to the biobehavioral systems of RST Second, we evaluate recent clarifications relating to interdependent effects that these systems may have on behavior, in addition to or in place of separable effects (e.g., Corr 2001; Pickering, 1997). Finally, we consider ambiguities regarding the exact trait dimension to which Gray's It reward system corresponds. From this review, we suggest that future work is needed to distinguish psychometric measures of (a) fear from anxiety and (b) reward-reactivity-from trait impulsivity. We also suggest, on the basis of interdependent system views of RST and associated exploration using formal models, that traits that are based upon RST are likely to have substantial intercorrelations. Finally, we advise that more substantive work is required to define relevant constructs and behaviors in RST before we can be confident in our psychometric measures of them.

Genetic polymorphisms in post-mortem alcoholics

We investigated the hypothesis that alcoholism risk may be mediated by genes for neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin, opioid, GABAA and glutamate) associated with the dopamine reward system, and with genes involved in ethanol metabolism and fibrogenesis (ADH2, ADH3, ALDH2, CYP2E1, COL1A2, and ApoE). DNA was extracted from brain tissue collected at autopsy from pathologically characterised alcoholics and controls. PCR-based studies showed that alcoholism was associated with polymorphisms of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) Taq1 B (p 0.005) and the GABAA 2 subunit C1412T (p 0.007) genes but not with the glutamate receptor subunit gene NR2B (366C/G), the serotonin transporter gene (5HTTL-PR), the dopamine transporter gene DAT1(SLC6A3), the Mu opioid receptor gene MOR1 (A118G and C1031G), the dopamine D2 receptor gene DRD2 Taq1 A or the GABAA 1(A15G), 6(T1519C) and 2(G3145A) subunit genes. The glial glutamate transporter gene EAAT2 polymorphism G603A was associated with alcoholic cirrhosis (p 0.024). The genotype for the most active alcohol dehydrogenase ADH3 was associated with a lower risk of alcoholism (p 0.027) and was less prevalent in alcoholics with DRD2 Taq1 A2/A2 (p 0.007), Taq1 B2/B2 (p 0.038) and GABAA-2 1412C/C (p 0.005) and EAAT2 603G/A (p 0.020) genotypes. Combined genotypes of DRD2 Taq1 A and B, GABAA-2, and EAAT2 G603A polymorphisms suggested a concerted influence of dopamine, GABAA and glutamatergic neurotransmitters in the predisposition to alcoholism.

Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White's (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective

The 'BIS/BAS scales' (Carver & White, 1994) is the most widely cited inventory for assessing Gray's (1982,1991) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality. A peculiarity of this instrument is its three-factor representation of Gray's Behavioural Activation System (BAS), which mediates reactions to reward. While the BAS was initially proposed as the causal basis of Impulsivity, recent arguments suggest that Impulsivity is related to but distinct from reward-reactivity. In this paper, two studies examined Carver and White's BAS scales in terms of factor structure, and convergent/divergent validity when predicting proxies of Impulsivity and reward-reactivity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed structural distinctions between the three BAS scales, and multivariate regression suggested that two of the scales (Drive and Reward-Responsiveness) reflect key concepts of the BAS, while the third (Fun-Seeking) has a broader focus, being equally related to reward-reactivity and Impulsivity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.