Chronic rhinosinusitis and eosinophils: do macrolides have an effect?

Purpose of review: Long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy is effective in the treatment of chronic airway inflammation. It is believed that macrolide antibiotics produce this benefit through an antiinflammatory effect that is separate from their antibiotic effect. Eosinophils are key mediators in the inflammation seen in chronic rhinosinusitis. This review discusses the effect of macrolides on eosinophilic inflammation. Recent findings: In vitro studies recently have suggested that macrolides increase eosinophil apoptosis and reduce production of eosinophil chemotactic cytokines and adhesion molecules. In vivo studies have shown a reduction in eosinophil count and activity in asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. Clinical response to macrolide treatment is thought to be less likely in patients with atopy. Summary: In contrast to the evidence supporting the effect of macrolides on neutrophilic inflammation, there are limited data to suggest an influence on eosinophilic inflammation. For this reason, patients with prominent eosinophilic inflammation may in the future be identified as being less likely to respond to treatment. Further in vitro and clinical studies are required to investigate this subject.

Effect of clarithromycin on nuclear factor-kappa B and transforming growth factor-beta in chronic rhinosinusitis

Objectives: Long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy is effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. It is believed that macrolide antibiotics produce this benefit through an anti-inflammatory effect. In this study, the effect of clarithromycin treatment on the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and the key pro-inflammatory nuclear transcription factor, NF-kappaB, was examined in vitro and in vivo. Study Design and Methods: In vitro: nasal mucosa was obtained from 10 patients with chronic sinusitis and was cultured for 24 hours in the presence of clarithromycin or control. Cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappaB was determined by immunohistochemistry. In vivo: 10 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were treated for 3 months with clarithromycin. Nasal mucosal biopsies were taken pre- and posttreatment. Cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappaB was again determined by immunohistochemistry. Results: Clarithromycin, when applied to nasal biopsies in vitro, reduced cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappaB. Nasal biopsies taken before and after clarithromycin treatment showed no differences in cellular expression of NF-kappaB or TGF-beta. Conclusion: Clarithromycin can reduce cellular expression of TGF-beta and NF-kappaB when applied in vitro, but its action during clinical therapy is less clear. Clarithromycin is capable of inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro, and reductions of TGF-beta and NF-kappaB may represent additional mechanisms by which macrolides reduce inflammation in chronic airway disease. Discrepancies between the actions of clarithromycin on nasal biopsies in vitro and after clinical therapy warrant further investigation.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of macrolide in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis

Objectives: The antiinflammatory effect of macrolide antibiotics has been well-established, as has their role in the treatment of certain disorders of chronic airway inflammation. Several studies have suggested that long-term, low-dose macrolides may be efficacious in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis; however, these studies have lacked a control group. To date, this effect has not been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Method: The authors conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on 64 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Subjects received either 150 mg roxithromycin daily for 3 months or placebo. Outcome measures included the Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), measurements of peak nasal inspiratory flow, saccharine transit time, olfactory function, nasal endoscopic scoring, and nasal lavage assays for interleukin-8, fucose, and a2-macroglobulin. Results. There were statistically significant improvements in SNOT-20 score, nasal endoscopy, saccharine transit time, and IL-8 levels in lavage fluid (P < .05) in the macrolide group. A correlation was noted between improved outcome measures and low IgE levels. No significant improvements were noted for olfactory function, peak nasal inspiratory flow, or lavage levels for fucose and a2-macroglobulin. No improvement in any outcome was noted in the placebo-treated patients. Conclusion: These findings suggest that macrolides may have a beneficial role in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis, particularly in patients with low levels of IgE, and supports the in vitro evidence of their antiinflammatory activity. Additional studies are required to assess their place in clinical practice.