Dual mode cooling house in the warm humid tropics

Passive techniques as an alternative to artificial cooling can bring important energy, environmental, financial, operational and qualitative benefits. However, regions such as the wet tropics can reach high levels of thermal stress in which passive means alone are unable to provide appropriate thermal comfort standards for some parts of the year. Despite a great accumulation of empirical information on the passive performance of houses for either free-running or conditioned modes, very little work has been done on the thermal performance of buildings that can operate with a mixed-running strategy in warm-humid climates. Buildings with such design features are able to balance the needs for comfort, privacy, and energy efficiency during different periods of the year. As free-running and conditioned modes are believed by many to be 'opposite' approaches, and have been presented as separate strategies, this paper demonstrates that not all parameters are directly opposite and a possible dual-mode integrated operation can be used for warm-humid locations for maximum comfort and minimum energy requirements. For this purpose, simulation runs using ESP-R (University of Strathclyde, ESRU, UK) were based on the climate data of Darwin (Australia) and on the ventilation styles of the house: free running and conditioned. Design features applicable to both, i.e. for a dual mode operation could be identified and the differences between conditioned and free running were demonstrated and proved not to be totally conflicting and therefore suitable for a dual mode operation. Different daily usage profiles (five use patterns were defined), and zoning of sleeping and living areas are presented. The dual mode use patterns compared to the base case house, for all the user possibilities, had improved performances of 17-52%, when compared to the free-running mode and 66-98% when compared to the conditioned mode. Simulation runs using other warm-humid climates (Miami, USA; Sao Luis, Brazil; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) were also conducted and compared to the results found for Darwin. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Glazing to entry, Mt. Nebo House

Leadlight windows with stained glass feature panes and timber muntins over french doors with matching leadlight sidelights.

Dining room, Mt. Nebo House

Interior view showing fireplace and mezzanine.

Hallway, Mt. Nebo House

Hallway off main entry to house.

Dormer window, Mt. Nebo House

Arched head leadlight and casement windows with stained glass feature panes and timber muntins. View through window from interior.

Dormer window, Mt. Nebo House

Arched head leadlight window with stained glass feature panes and timber muntins.

Garage-studio interior, Mt. Nebo House

Timber framing and roof skylight detail inside garage-studio.

Upper level, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

View along North-West elevation upper level.

Iwan, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

As seen from pool deck.

The Nest, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

Timber deck with built-in seat overlooking greater landscape beyond.

Pool deck, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

View back towards house from deck. with Iwan (right) and filter room (left).

The Nest, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

Concrete framework for The Nest (North-West elevation), with timber framework yet to be added.

North-West elevation, C House, Cooparoo, Brisbane

Entry stair in foreground.

Pool deck, C House, Coorparoo, Brisbane

As seen from The Nest above