The role of the complement system in ischemia-reperfusion injury

Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common clinical event with the potential to seriously affect, and sometimes kill, the patient. Interruption of blood supply causes ischemia, which rapidly damages metabolically active tissues. Paradoxically, restoration of blood flow to the ischemic tissues initiates a cascade of pathology that leads to additional cell or tissue injury. I/R is a potent inducer of complement activation that results in the production of a number of inflammatory mediators. The use of specific inhibitors to block complement activation has been shown to prevent local tissue injury after I/R. Clinical and experimental studies in gut, kidney, limb, and liver have shown that I/R results in local activation of the complement system and leads to the production of the complement factors C3a, C5a, and the membrane attack complex. The novel inhibitors of complement products may find wide clinical application because there are no effective drug therapies currently available to treat I/R injuries.

Renal endothelial dysfunction and impaired autoregulation after ischemia-reperfusion injury result from excess nitric oxide

Endothelial dysfunction in ischemic acute renal failure (IARF) has been attributed to both direct endothelial injury and to altered endothelial nitric oxide synthase ( eNOS) activity, with either maximal upregulation of eNOS or inhibition of eNOS by excess nitric oxide ( NO) derived from iNOS. We investigated renal endothelial dysfunction in kidneys from Sprague-Dawley rats by assessing autoregulation and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation 24 h after unilateral ( U) or bilateral ( B) renal artery occlusion for 30 (U30, B30) or 60 min (U60, B60) and in sham-operated controls. Although renal failure was induced in all degrees of ischemia, neither endothelial dysfunction nor altered facilitation of autoregulation by 75 pM angiotensin II was detected in U30, U60, or B30 kidneys. Baseline and angiotensin II-facilitated autoregulation were impaired, methacholine EC50 was increased, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor ( EDHF) activity was preserved in B60 kidneys. Increasing angiotensin II concentration restored autoregulation and increased renal vascular resistance ( RVR) in B60 kidneys; this facilitated autoregulation, and the increase in RVR was abolished by 100 mu M furosemide. Autoregulation was enhanced by N-omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Peri-ischemic inhibition of inducible NOS ameliorated renal failure but did not prevent endothelial dysfunction or impaired autoregulation. There was no significant structural injury to the afferent arterioles with ischemia. These results suggest that tubuloglomerular feedback is preserved in IARF but that excess NO and probably EDHF produce endothelial dysfunction and antagonize autoregulation. The threshold for injury-producing, detectable endothelial dysfunction was higher than for the loss of glomerular filtration rate. Arteriolar endothelial dysfunction after prolonged IARF is predominantly functional rather than structural.

Complement factor 5a as a therapeutic target

The complement system is an innate immune defense mechanism that protects the host from infection and injury. Complement activation results in the formation of anaphylatoxins, including the biologically active protein C5a. This anaphylatoxin is a potent chemotactic agent for immune and inflammatory cells and induces cell activation. In situations of excessive or uncontrolled complement activation, the overproduction of C5a can cause deleterious effects to the host, and this process is implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous immunoinflammatory disease states, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, ischemia-reperfusion injuries and others. The presence of C5a in a wide variety of condition's has prompted many groups to examine the potential of inhibiting this complement activation product, with the aim of controlling these diseases and reducing the pathologic process. However, to date there is no clinically available specific C5a inhibitor and development of this new drug class is still in a relatively early stage, although limited phase I and phase II human clinical trials have been undertaken in the last few years with selected agents. In this review, examination of the current evidence supporting a specific role of C5a in selected disease states and an overview of potential therapeutic C5a inhibitors will enable the critical evaluation of the potential for C5a as a therapeutic target.