Laparoscopic Swenson procedure - An optimal approach for both primary and secondary pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease

Background/Purpose: Several pull-through procedures are available for the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in children. The authors have adopted a laparoscopic approach since 1995, including laparoscopic Swenson procedure (LSw), both for one-stage primary and 2-stage secondary procedures. The aim of this study was to examine the role of LSw in children with HD in both primary and secondary procedures. Methods: From January 1995 to December 2001, 42 children with biopsy-proven HD underwent laparoscopic pull-through procedure for HD. This group included 29 children who underwent LSw, a detailed analysis of which forms the basis of this report. Results: Sixteen children underwent a single-stage neonatal LSw; the median weight of this group at the time of surgery was 3.2 kg and the median age was 5 days. Secondary LSw was performed in the remaining 13 children, which included 3 children with total colonic HD who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy and LSw. The median operating time was 105 minutes (range, 66 to 175 minutes). The median time to commence full diet was 48 hours (range, 24 to 86 hours), and median time to return to normal play and activity was 72 hours (range, 48 hours to 5 days). There was no difference in operating time between primary and secondary pull-through procedures. There were no intraoperative complications, and no patient required open conversion. Postoperative ileus was noted in 3 children and enterocolitis in 2. The median hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2 to 6 days). Follow-up was between 6 months to 7 years with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. At follow-up, 2 children required laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure. A satisfactory continence was noted in 15 of the 19 children who were older than 3 years at the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: LSw seems to be a suitable procedure for laparoscopic management of HD in children. LSw is safe and effective, both for primary and secondary type of pull-through procedures, with good short-term results.

An optimal sequential procedure for a buying-selling problem with independent observations

We consider a buying-selling problem when two stops of a sequence of independent random variables are required. An optimal stopping rule and the value of a game are obtained.

Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant

The notion of being sure that you have completely eradicated an invasive species is fanciful because of imperfect detection and persistent seed banks. Eradication is commonly declared either on an ad hoc basis, on notions of seed bank longevity, or on setting arbitrary thresholds of 1% or 5% confidence that the species is not present. Rather than declaring eradication at some arbitrary level of confidence, we take an economic approach in which we stop looking when the expected costs outweigh the expected benefits. We develop theory that determines the number of years of absent surveys required to minimize the net expected cost. Given detection of a species is imperfect, the optimal stopping time is a trade-off between the cost of continued surveying and the cost of escape and damage if eradication is declared too soon. A simple rule of thumb compares well to the exact optimal solution using stochastic dynamic programming. Application of the approach to the eradication programme of Helenium amarum reveals that the actual stopping time was a precautionary one given the ranges for each parameter.