Protease-activated receptor-2 peptides activate neurokinin-1 receptors in the mouse isolated trachea

Protective roles for protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) in the airways including activation of epithelial chloride (Cl-) secretion are based on the use of presumably PAR(2)-selective peptide agonists. To determine whether PAR(2) peptide-activated Cl- secretion from mouse tracheal epithelium is dependent on PAR(2), changes in ion conductance across the epithelium [short-circuit current (I-SC)] to PAR(2) peptides were measured in Ussing chambers under voltage clamp. In addition, epithelium and endothelium-dependent relaxations to these peptides were measured in two established PAR(2) bioassays, isolated ring segments of mouse trachea and rat thoracic aorta, respectively. Apical application of the PAR(2) peptide SLIGRL caused increases in I-SC, which were inhibited by three structurally different neurokinin receptor-1 (NK1R) antagonists and inhibitors of Cl- channels but not by capsaicin, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist CGRP(8-37), or the nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. Only high concentrations of trypsin caused an increase in I-SC but did not affect the responses to SLIGRL. Relaxations to SLIGRL in the trachea and aorta were unaffected by the NK1R antagonist nolpitantium (SR 140333) but were abolished by trypsin desensitization. The rank order of potency for a range of peptides in the trachea I-SC assay was 2-furoyl-LIGRL > SLCGRL > SLIGRL > SLIGRT > LSIGRL compared with 2-furoyl-LIGRL > SLIGRL > SLIGRT > SLCGRL (LSIGRL inactive) in the aorta relaxation assay. In the mouse trachea, PAR(2) peptides activate both epithelial NK1R coupled to Cl- secretion and PAR(2) coupled to prostaglandin E-2-mediated smooth muscle relaxation. Such a potential lack of specificity of these commonly used peptides needs to be considered when roles for PAR(2) in airway function in health and disease are determined.

Radial artery pulse upstroke is not a good marker of left ventricular dysfunction: A comparison of radial tonometry, angiographic and echocardiographic measures of dP/dt

The first derivative of pressure over time (dP/dt) is a marker of left ventricular (LV) systolic function that can be assessed during cardiac catheterization and echocardiography. Radial artery dP/dt (Radial-dP/dt) has been proposed as a possible marker of LV systolic function (Nichols & O’Rourke, McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries) and we sought to test this hypothesis. Methods:We compared simultaneously recorded RadialdP/ dt (by high-fidelity tonometry) with LV-dP/dt (by highfidelity catheter and echocardiography parameters analogous to LV-dP/dt) in patients without aortic valve disease. In study 1, beat to beat Radial-dP/dt and LV-dP/dt were recorded at rest and during supine exercise in 12 males (aged 61±12 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization. In study 2, 2D-echocardiography and Radial-dP/dt were recorded in 59 patients (43 men; aged 64±10 years) at baseline and peak dobutamine-induced stress. Three measures at the basal septum were taken as being analogous to LV-dP/dt: (1) peak systolic strain rate, (2) strain rate (SR-dP/dt), and (3) tissue velocity during isovolumic contraction. Results: Study 1; there was a significant difference between resting LV-dP/dt (1461±383 mmHg/s) and Radial-dP/dt (1182±319 mmHg/s; P < 0.001), and a poor, but statistically significant, correlation between the variables (R2 = 0.006; P < 0.001) due to the high number of data points compared (n = 681). Similar results were observed during exercise. Study 2; there was a moderate association between baseline Radial-dP/dt and SRdP/ dt (R2 =−0.17; P < 0.01), but no significant relationship between Radial-dP/dt and all other echocardiographic measures analogous to LV-dP/dt at rest or peak stress (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The radial pressurewaveform is not a reliable marker of LV contractility.