Modeling ex vivo hematopoiesis using chemical engineering metaphors

Ex vivo hematopoiesis is increasingly used for clinical applications. Models of ex vivo hematopoiesis are required to better understand the complex dynamics and to optimize hematopoietic culture processes. A general mathematical modeling framework is developed which uses traditional chemical engineering metaphors to describe the complex hematopoietic dynamics. Tanks and tubular reactors are used to describe the (pseudo-) stochastic and deterministic elements of hematopoiesis, respectively. Cells at any point in the differentiation process can belong to either an immobilized, inert phase (quiescent cells) or a mobile, active phase (cycling cells). The model describes five processes: (1) flow (differentiation), (2) autocatalytic formation (growth),(3) degradation (death), (4) phase transition from immobilized to mobile phase (quiescent to cycling transition), and (5) phase transition from mobile to immobilized phase (cycling to quiescent transition). The modeling framework is illustrated with an example concerning the effect of TGF-beta 1 on erythropoiesis. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Proliferation in monocyte-derived dendritic cell cultures is caused by progenitor cells capable of myeloid differentiation

Dendritic cells (DC) can be generated by culture of adherent peripheral blood (PB) cells in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). There is controversy as to whether these DC arise from proliferating precursors or simply from differentiation of monocytes. DC were generated from myeloid-enriched PB non-T cells or sorted monocytes. DC generated from either population functioned as potent antigen-presenting cells. Uptake of [H-3]-thymidine was observed in DC cultured from myeloid-enriched non-T cells. Addition of lipopolysaccharide or tumor necrosis factor-alpha led to maturation of the DC, but did not inhibit proliferation. Ki67(+) cells were observed in cytospins of these DC, and by double staining were CD3(-)CD19(-)CD11c(-)CD40(-) and myeloperoxidase(+), suggesting that they were myeloid progenitor cells. Analysis of the starting population by flow cytometry demonstrated small numbers of CD34(+)CD33(-)CD14(-) progenitor cells, and numerous granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units were generated in standard assays. Thus, production of DC in vitro from adherent PB cells also enriches for progenitor cells that are capable of proliferation after exposure to GM-CSF. Of clinical importance, the yield of DC derived in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 cannot be expanded beyond the number of starting monocytes. (C) 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Proliferation in monocyte-derived dendritic cell cultures is due to cells capable of myeloid differentiation

Dendritic cells (DC) can be generated by culture of adherent peripheral blood (PB) cells in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). There is controversy as to whether these DC arise from proliferating precursors or simply from differentiation of monocytes. DC were generated from myeloid-enriched PB non-T cells or sorted monocytes. DC generated from either population functioned as potent antigen-presenting cells. Uptake of [H-3]-thymidine was observed in DC cultured from myeloid-enriched non-T cells. Addition of lipopolysaccharide or tumor necrosis factor-alpha led to maturation of the DC, but did not inhibit proliferation. Ki67(+) cells were observed in cytospins of these DC, and by double staining were CD3(-)CD19(-)CD11c(-)CD40(-) and myeloperoxidase(+), suggesting that they were myeloid progenitor cells. Analysis of the starting population by flow cytometry demonstrated small numbers of CD34(+)CD33(-)CD14(-) progenitor cells, and numerous granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units were generated in standard assays. Thus, production of DC in vitro from adherent PB cells also enriches for progenitor cells that are capable of proliferation after exposure to GM-CSF. Of clinical importance, the yield of DC derived in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 cannot be expanded beyond the number of starting monocytes. (C) 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.

Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-primed allogeneic bone marrow: significantly less graft-versus-host disease and comparable engraftment to G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells

Prospective studies have shown rapid engraftment using granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSCs) for allogeneic transplantation, though the risks for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) may be increased. It was hypothesized that the use of G-CSF to prime bone marrow (GBM) would allow rapid engraftment without increased risk for GVHD compared with G-PBSC. Patients were randomized to receive G-BM or G-PBSCs for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The study was designed (beta < .8) to detect a difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD of 33% ( < .05). The plan was to recruit 100 patients and to conduct an interim analysis when the 6-month follow-up point was reached for the first 50 patients. Fifty-seven consecutive patients were recruited (G-BM, n = 28; G-PBSC, n = 29). Patients in the G-PBSC group received 3-fold more CD34(+) and 9-fold more CD3(+) cells. Median times to neutrophil (G-BM, 16 days; G-PBSC, 14 days; P < .1) and platelet engraftment (G-BM, 14 days; G-PBSC, 12 days; P < .1) were similar. The use of G-PBSC was associated with steroid refractory acute GVHD (G-BM, 0%; G-PBSC, 32%; P < .001), chronic GVHD (G-BM, 22%; G-PBSC, 80%; P < .02), and prolonged requirement for immunosuppressive therapy (G-BM, 173 days; G-PBSC, 680 days; P < .009). Survival was similar for the 2 groups. Compared with G-PBSC the use of G-BM resulted in comparable engraftment, reduced severity of acute GVHD, and less subsequent chronic GVHD. (Blood. 2001;98:3186-3191) (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing CD-34Selected Versus Unmanipulated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe, Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective. Evidence from animal studies, case reports, and phase I studies suggests that hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear, however, if depletion of T cells in the stem cell product infused after high-dose chemotherapy is beneficial in prolonging responses by reducing the number of infused autoreactive T cells. This pilot multicenter, randomized trial was undertaken to obtain feasibility data on whether CD34 selection (as a form of T cell depletion) of an autologous stem cell graft is of benefit in the HSCT procedure in patients with severe, refractory RA. Methods. Thirty-three patients with severe RA who had been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate and at least 1 other disease-modifying agent were enrolled in the trial. The patients received high-dose immunosuppressive treatment with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide followed by an infusion of autologous stem cells that were CD34 selected or unmanipulated. Safety, efficacy (based on American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria), and time to recurrence of disease were assessed on a monthly basis for up to 12 months. Results. All patients were living at the end of the study, with no major unexpected toxicities. Overall, on an intent-to-treat basis, ACR 20% response (ACR20) was achieved in 70% of the patients. An ACR70 response was attained in 27.7% of the 18 patients who had received CD34-selected cells and 53.3% of the 15 who had received unmanipulated cells (P = 0.20). The median time to disease recurrence was 147 days in the CD34-selected cell group and 201 days in the unmanipulated cell group (P = 0.28). There was no relationship between CD4 lymphopenia and response, but 72% of rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients had an increase in RF titer prior to recurrence of disease. Conclusion. HSCT can be performed safely in patients with RA, and initial results indicate significant responses in patients with severe, treatment-resistant disease. Similar outcomes were observed in patients undergoing HSCT with unmanipulated cells and those receiving CD34-selected cells. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.