Extracellular calcium stimulates Na+-dependent putrescine uptake in B16 melanoma cells

The regulation of putrescine transport in difluoromethylornithine-treated B16 melanoma cells by extracellular Ca2+ has been investigated. It was found that physiological concentrations of Ca2+ were essential for optimum uptake of putrescine and spermidine. Mg2+, albeit at higher concentrations, also could potentiate polyamine transport. The maximum rate of putrescine uptake increased from 1698 +/-: 67 pmol/min/mg DNA in the absence of Ca2+ to 3100 +/- 98 pmol/min/mg DNA in the presence of 0.5 mM Ca2+. There was no change in K-m. While Ca2+ enhanced transport of both putrescine and spermidine it did not affect the uptake of deoxyglucose, thymidine or leucine. Putrescine did not alter Ca2+ fluxes suggesting that the two cations do not share a common transport system. The effects of Ca2+ on putrescine uptake appeared to be mediated extracellularly firstly because Ca2+ did not potentiate putrescine uptake in the presence of A23187 and secondly, because the effects of Ca2+ were completely inhibited by the lanthanide Tb3+, which binds to calcium-dependent proteins and does not readily cross biological membranes. Ca2+ did not affect putrescine transport in the absence of extracellular Na+. Moreover, the rate of putrescine uptake in the absence of Ca2+ was similar to that in the absence of extracellular Na+. The results from this study indicate that polyamine transport is stimulated by extracellular Ca2+ and suggest that Ca2+ is required for activity of the Na+-dependent transporter only. This transporter appears to possess a regulatory binding site for divalent cations. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Introduction

In 1691, eighteen years after its original publication, Samuel Pufendorf’s De officio hominis et civis appeared in English translation in London, bearing the title The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature. This translation, by Andrew Tooke (1673–1732), professor of geometry at Gresham College, passed largely unaltered through two subsequent editions, in 1698 and 1705, before significant revision and augmentation in the fourth edition of 1716. Unchanged, this text was then reissued as the fifth and final edition of 1735, which is here republished for the first time since.1 Five editions, spanning almost half a century, bear testimony to the English appetite for Pufendorf’s ideas.