Nickel complexes with tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren): [Ni-3(tren)(4)(H2O)(2)][Cr(ox)(3)](2)center dot 6H(2)O (ox = oxalate), {[Ni-2(tren)(3)][ClO4](4)center dot H2O}(n), and [Ni-2(tren)(2)(aepd)][ClO4](4)center dot 2H(2)O (aepd = N-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidi

Reaction of K-3[Cr(ox)(3)] (ox = oxalate) with nickel(II) and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) in aqueous solution resulted in isolation of the bimetallic assembly [Ni-3(tren)(4)(H2O)(2)][Cr(ox)(3)](2). 6H(2)O. The polymeric complex {[Ni-2(tren)(3)][ClO4](4). H2O}(n) has been prepared by reaction of nickel(II) perchlorate and tren in aqueous solution. From the same reaction mixture the complex [Ni-2(tren)(2)(aepd)][ClO4](4). 2H(2)O (aepd = N-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine-3,4-diamine), in which a bridging tren ligand contains a carbon-carbon bond between two arms forming a substituted pyrrolidine, has been isolated. The complexes have been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The magnetic susceptibility (300-4.2 K) and magnetization data (2, 4 K, H = 0-5 T) for {[Ni-2(tren)(3)][ClO4](4). H2O}(n) (300 K , 4.23 mu(B)) exhibit evidence of weak antiferromagnetic coupling and zero field splitting (2J = -1.8 cm(-1); \ D\ = 2 cm(-1)) at low temperature. For [Ni-3(tren)(4)(H2O)(2)][Cr(ox)(3)](2). 6H(2)O the susceptibility data at 300 K are indicative of uncoupled nickel(II) and chromium(III) sites with zero-field splitting and intramolecular antiferromagnetic coupling predicted at low temperature.

Diverse solid-state and solution structures within a series of hexaamine dicopper(II) complexes

Mono- and dicopper(II) complexes of a series of potentially bridging hexaamine ligands have been prepared and characterized in the solid state by X-ray crystallography. The crystal structures of the following Cu-II complexes are reported: [Cu(HL3)](ClO4)(3), C11H31Cl3CuN6O12, monoclinic, P2(1)/n, a = 8.294(2) Angstrom, b = 18.364(3) Angstrom, c = 15.674(3) Angstrom, beta = 94.73(2)degrees, Z = 4; {[Cu-2(L-4)(CO3)](2)}(ClO4)(4). 4H(2)O, C40H100Cl4Cu4N12O26, triclinic, P (1) over bar, a = 9.4888(8) Angstrom, b=13.353(1) Angstrom,. c = 15.329(1) Angstrom, alpha = 111.250(7)degrees, beta = 90.068(8)degrees, gamma = 105.081(8)degrees, Z=1; [Cu-2(L-5)(OH2)(2)](ClO4)(4), C(13)H(36)Cl(4)Cu(2)Z(6)O(18), monoclinic, P2(1)/c, a = 7.225(2) Angstrom. b = 8.5555(5) Angstrom, c = 23.134(8) Angstrom, beta = 92.37(1)degrees, Z = 2; [Cu-2(L-6)(OH2)(2)](ClO4)(4). 3H(2)O, C14H44Cl4Cu2N6O21, monoclinic, P2(1)/a, a = 15.204(5) Angstrom, b = 7.6810(7) Angstrom, c = 29.370(1) Angstrom, beta = 100.42(2)degrees, Z = 4. Solution spectroscopic properties of the bimetallic complexes indicate that significant conformational changes occur upon dissolution, and this has been probed with EPR spectroscopy and molecular mechanics calculations.