Disturbances in microbiota - cause or effect?

IBD are a group of complex polygenetic diseases also involving environmental factors. Evidence for a role for bacteria in IBD include an increased abundance of mucosa-associated bacteria in IBD (which occurs even where there is no intestinal inflammation), and the positive impact of antibiotics on the progress of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) of the pouch - pouchitis. Bacteria are necessary for most animal models of IBD. The increased abundance of mucosal bacteria in IBD is not non-specific because while some mucosal bacteria are more abundant this is not the case for all mucosal bacteria including the very abundant Bacteroides vulgatus. On the other hand, antibiotic treatments are not curative, and the humoral immune Ig response to bacterial antigens which is more evident in CD, appears to be polyclonal. While this argues against a role for specific bacteria causing a classical infection, certain mucosal bacteria may damage the mucosal barrier. This would promote invasion by other commensal mucosal bacteria triggering an immune response. Altered adaptive, and to a lesser extent, innate immunity have been extensively studied, and genetic defects in the CARD15 (or NOD2) gene that encodes a bacterial sensing protein modulating innate and adaptive immunity are strongly associated with ileal CD. However, the penetrance of the homozygous CARD15 frameshift mutation, which is the most strongly CD-associated genotype, is very low with only 4% of humans with this developing CD. Furthermore, mice with the same defects in CARD15 do not develop spontaneous ileitis or colitis. Therefore, there have to be other aetiological factor(s). Altered permeability is a consistent finding in subclinical CD. There are other data to suggest that altered mucin is an early event in UC. We propose that the pathogenesis of IBD is multifactorial involving specific mucosal bacteria, defective barrier function and altered mucosal immunity in an aetiology triangle.

Willingness to pay for conservation of the Asian elephant in Sri Lanka: A contingent valuation study

Results from a CVM survey of willingness to pay for the conservation of the Asian elephant of a sample of urban residents in three selected housing schemes in Colombo, the capital of Sri Lanka, are reported. Face– to–face surveys were conducted using an interview schedule. A non-linear logit regression model was constructed to analyse the respondents’ responses for the payment principle questions and to identify the factors that influence their responses. We investigate whether urban residents’ WTP for the conservation of elephants is sufficient to compensate farmers for the damage caused by elephants, and consequently to raise farmers’ tolerance of the presence of elephants on the farming fields. We find that beneficiaries (the urban residents) could compensate losers (the farmers in the HEC affected areas) and be better off than in the absence of elephants in Sri Lanka. This suggests that there is a strong economic case for the conservation of the wild elephant population in Sri Lanka. However, we have insufficient data to determine Sri Lanka’s optimal elephant population in the Kaldor-Hicks sense.

The net benefit of saving the Asian Elephant: A policy and contingent valuation Study

Reports results from a contingent valuation survey of willingness to pay for the conservation of the Asian elephant of a sample of urban residents living in three selected housing schemes in Colombo, the capital of Sri Lanka. Face–to–face surveys were conducted using an interview schedule. A non-linear logit regression model is used to analyse the respondents’ responses for the payment principle questions and to identify the factors that influence their responses. We investigate whether urban residents’ willingness to pay for the conservation of elephants is sufficient to compensate farmers for the damage caused by elephants. We find that the beneficiaries (the urban residents) could compensate losers (the farmers in the areas affected by human–elephant conflict) and be better off than in the absence of elephants in Sri Lanka. Therefore, there is a strong economic case for the conservation of the wild elephant population in Sri Lanka. However, we have insufficient data to determine the optimal level of this elephant population in the Kaldor-Hicks sense. Nevertheless, the current population of elephant in Sri Lanka is Kaldor-Hicks preferable to having none.