Factors influencing organisational silence

Organisadonal silence is a recendy introduced area of business research that seeks to address why employees fail to express ideas, informadon and opinions that can effecdvely improve organisadonal effecdveness. In making a start to understand silence, the majority of frameworks have suggested that employees withhold valuable input from management because they believe that it is too personally cosdy to speak up, and/or management are unMkely to take acdon about their ideas or concerns. Because today's workforce are largely required to work in groups or teams, one of the primary aims of this paper is to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon by focusing on group process factors that are likely to drive silence. Research that consider the group perspecdve indicate that one's ingroup posidon (i,e,, pro to typicality), and the accumuladon of idiosyncrasy credits (i,e,, leeway to offer innovadve ideas) are likely to play a role in whether (or not) people speak up. For example, those on the periphery of the group or less prototypical group members may need to conform strenuously to group norms in order to improve their ingroup posidon. Similarly, those who have accrued few idiosyncrasy credits may need to conform to group expectadons in order to accumulate sufficient "resources" to deviate from group norms, and be taken seriously by other group members. Thus, the conceptual framework proposed is underpinned by the social idendty perspecdve as well as the nodon of idiosyncrasy credits.

Zipping up transcription factors: Rational design of anti-Jun and anti-Fos peptides

Various members of the bZip and bHLH-Zip families of eukaryotic transcription factors, including Jun, Fos, and Myc, have been identified as oncoproteins; mutation or deregulated expression of these proteins leads to certain types of cancer. These proteins can only bind to their cognate DNA enhancer sites following homodimerization, or heterodimerization with another family member, via their leucine zipper domain. Thus, a novel anticancer strategy would be to inhibit dimerization of these proteins, thereby blocking their DNA binding and transactivation functions. In this paper we show that it is possible to rationally design leucine zipper peptides that bind with high affinity to the leucine zipper dimerization domains of c-Jun and c-Fos, thus preventing the formation of functional c-Jun homodimers and c-Jun:c-Fos heterodimers; we refer to such peptides as superzippers (SZs). In vivo, c-Jun:SZ and c-Fos:SZ heterodimers should be nonfunctional as they lack one of the two basic domains that are essential for DNA binding. While the transport of a peptidic agent into cells often poses a severe obstacle to its therapeutic use, we show that a 46-residue leucine zipper peptide can be transported into HeLa cells by coupling it to a 17-residue carrier peptide from the Antennapedia homeodomain, thus paving the way for detailed studies of the therapeutic potential of superzipper peptides.

Design analysis for refolding monomeric protein

Renaturation of protein expressed as inclusion bodies within Escherichia coli is a key step in many bioprocesses. Operating conditions for the refolding step dramatically affect the amount of protein product recovered, and hence profoundly influence the process economics. The first systematic comparison of refolding conducted in batch, fed-batch and continuous stirred-tank reactors is provided Refolding is modeled as kinetic competition between first-order refolding (equilibrium reaction) and irreversible aggregation (second-order). Simulations presented allow direct comparison between different flowsheets and refolding schemes using a dimensionless economic objective. As expected from examination of the reaction kinetics, batch operation is the most inefficient merle. For the base process considered, the overall cost of fed-batch and continuous refolding is virtually identical (less than half that of the batch process). Reactor selection and optimization of refolding using overall economics are demonstrated to be vitally important.

Investigating the influence of achievement on self-concept using an intra-class design and a comparison of the PASS and SDQ-1 self-concept tests

Background. The formation and measurement of self-concept were the foci of this research. Aims. The study aimed to investigate the influence of achievement on academic self-concept and to compare the Perception of Ability Scale for Students (PASS, Boersma & Chapman, 1992) with the Self-Description Questionnaire-1 (SDQ-1, Marsh, 1988). Sample. The participants were 479 grade 5 (mean age 126.6 months) coeducational Australian students, located in 18 schools. Method. An intra-class research design was used to investigate the influence of frame-of-reference on self-concept development. Results. As students' academic scores rose above their class mean their self-concepts increased and as students' academic scores fell below their class mean their self-concepts decreased. Students' difference from class mean predicted their self-concept scores. This finding was consistently shown across the reading, spelling, and mathematics domains using test and teaching rating data. A comparison between the PASS and the SDQ-1 demonstrated concurrent validity across self-concept domains. Conclusion. The findings support the notions that the social environment is a significant agent that influences self-concept, and that teacher ratings and standardised tests of achievement and the PASS and the SDQ-1 are valid measures for self-concept research.