Regulation and properties of KCNQ1 (K(v)LQT1) and impact of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

The K+ channel KCNQ1 (K(V)LQT1) is a voltage-gated K+ channel, coexpressed with regulatory subunits such as KCNE1 (IsK, mink) or KCNE3, depending on the tissue examined. Here, we investigate regulation and properties of human and rat KCNQ1 and the impact of regulators such as KCNE1 and KCNE3. Because the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) has also been suggested to regulate KCNQ1 channels we studied the effects of CFTR on KCNQ1 in Xenopus oocytes, Expression of both human and rat KCNQ1 induced time dependent K+ currents that were sensitive to Ba2+ and 293B. Coexpression with KCNE1 delayed voltage activation, while coexpression with KCNE3 accelerated current activation. KCNQ1 currents were activated by an increase in intracellular cAMP, independent of coexpression with KCNE1 or KCNE3. cAMP dependent activation was abolished in N-terminal truncated hKCNQ1 but was still detectable after deletion of a single PKA phosphorylation motif. In the presence but not in the absence of KCNE1 or KCNE3, K+ currents were activated by the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin. Coexpression of CFTR with either human or rat KCNQ1 had no impact on regulation of KCNQ1 K+ currents by cAMP but slightly shifted the concentration response curve for 293B. Thus, KCNQ1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes is regulated by cAMP and Ca2+ but is not affected by CFTR.

A review of the impact of education and prior experience on new venture performance

The importance of education and experience to the successful performance of new firms is well recognized both by management practitioners and academics. Yet empirical research to support the significance of this relationship is inconclusive. This paper discusses theories describing the relationship between education and experience and firm performance. It also analyses and classifies the differing measures of performance, education and experience, and compares the results of multiple studies undertaken between 1977 and 2000. Possible reasons for conflicting results are identified, such as lack of sound theoretical bases that relate education and experience to performance, varying definitions of the key variables and the diversity of measures used. Finally, a framework is developed that incorporates variables that interact with experience and education to influence new venture performance.

The impact of the Human Genome Project on medical genetics

The near completion of the Human Genome Project stands as a remarkable achievement, with enormous implications for both science and society. For scientists, it is the first step in a complex process that will lead to important advances in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. Society, meanwhile, must prevent genetic discrimination, and protect genetic privacy through appropriate legislation.

The impact of an expert's gender on jurors' decisions

This study uses a simulated civil trial to examine the effect of a male expert's testimony in a male-dominated industry as compared to a female expert's testimony in a traditionally female-dominated industry. ... As noted by Cooper et al., research on persuasion has reliably demonstrated that, under conditions of message complexity, people rely on heuristic cues rather than the content of the message when judging its validity. ... Similarly, Swenson, Nash, and Roos determined that a female expert witness in a child custody dispute was perceived as possessing greater expertise than a male expert, although this difference was only marginally significant. Findings from an unpublished dissertation, which investigated the influence of expert gender in a case involving child sexual abuse, also found some support, in terms of whether or not jurors reached a verdict in a specified period of time or remained hung, for the hypothesis that a female expert would be more influential than her male counterpart. ... Within each of these trial domains (construction, women's clothing), the second experimental variable was manipulated by varying the gender of the plaintiff's expert witness, with half of the participants receiving testimony from a female expert (Dr. Elizabeth Pinder) and half of the participants receiving testimony from a male expert (Dr. Michael Pinder).