Can myocardial contrast echo provide incremental benefit to exercise echo? Implications of the intensity and duration of hyperaemia

Background. Stress myocardial contrast echo (MCE) is technically challenging with exercise (Ex) because of cardiacmovementandshort duration ofhyperemia.Vasodilators solve these limitations, but are less potent for inducing abnormal wall motion (WM). We sought whether a combined dipyridamole (DI; 0.56 mg/kg i.v. 4 min) and Ex stress protocol would enable MCE to provide incremental benefit toWManalysis for detection of CAD. Methods. Standard echo images were followed by real time MCE at rest and following stress in 85 pts, 70 undergoing quantitative coronary angiography and 15 low risk pts.WMAfrom standard and LVopacification images, and then myocardial perfusion were assessed sequentially in a blinded fashion. A subgroup of 13 pts also underwent Ex alone, to assess the contribution of DI to quantitative myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Results. Significant (>50%) stenoses were present in 43 pts, involving 69 territories. Addition of MCE improved SE sensitivity for detection of CAD (91% versus 74%, P = 0.02) and better appreciation of disease extent (87% versus 65%territories, P=0.003), with a non-significant reduction in specificity. In 55 territories subtended by a significant stenosis, but with no resting WM abnormality, ability to identify ischemia was also significantly increased by MCE (82% versus 60%, P = 0.002). MFR was less with Ex alone than with DIEx stress (2.4 ± 1.6 versus 4.0 ± 1.9, P = 0.05), suggesting prolongation of hyperaemia with DI may be essential to the results. Conclusions. Dipyridamole-exercise MCE adds significant incremental benefit to standard SE, with improved diagnostic sensitivity and more accurate estimation of extent of CAD.

Determinants of visual 2-D echo assessment of left ventricular wall motion: Comparison with myocardial thickening on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background: left ventricular wall motion on 2d echo (2de) is usually scored visually. we sought to examine the determinants of visually assessed wall motion scoring on 2de by comparison with myocardial thickening quantified on MRI. Methods: using a 16 segment model, we studied 287 segments in 30 patients aged 61+/ -11 years (6 female), with ischaemic LV dysfunction (defined by at least 2 segments dysfunctional on 2de). 2de was performed in 5 views and wall motion scores (WMS) assigned: 1 (normal) 103 segments, 2 (hypokinetic) 93 segments, 3 (akinetic) 87 segments. MRI was used to measure end systolic wall thickness (ESWT), end diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and percentage systolic wall thickening (SWT%) in the plane of the 2de and to assess WMS in the same planes visually. No patient had a clinical ischemic event between the tests. Results: visual assessment of wall motion by 2de and MRI showed moderate agreement (kappa = 0.425). Resting 2de wall motion correlated significantly (p

Comparison between myocardial integrated backscatter and strain rate imaging in the quantitative assessment of subepicardial function post-myocardial infarction

Transmural extent of infarction (TME) may be an important determinant of functional recovery and remodeling. Recent animal data suggest that strain rate imaging (SRI) maybe able to identify subendocardial ischemia.We compared SRI and cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) for predicting TME in the quantitative assessment of regional subepicardial function. Forty-nine (n = 49) postmyocardial infarct patients (61±10 years, EF 41±10%) underwent tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). A15 mm×2mm sampling volume (tracked to wall motion) was placed over the long axis subepicardial region of each segment during TDE offline analysis to measure peak longitudinal systolic strain rate (SR), peak longitudinal systolic strain (PS), and CVIB. Findingswere compared with TME classified into two categories of scar thickness by CMR: Non-transmural (TME≤50%), and transmural (TME > 50%). Of 213 segments identified with resting wall motion abnormalities, 145 segments showed delayed hyperenhancement on CMR. SR, PS and CVIB were similar with no significant differences between transmural and non-transmural infarcts regardless of the echo modality.