Determinants of visual 2-D echo assessment of left ventricular wall motion: Comparison with myocardial thickening on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background: left ventricular wall motion on 2d echo (2de) is usually scored visually. we sought to examine the determinants of visually assessed wall motion scoring on 2de by comparison with myocardial thickening quantified on MRI. Methods: using a 16 segment model, we studied 287 segments in 30 patients aged 61+/ -11 years (6 female), with ischaemic LV dysfunction (defined by at least 2 segments dysfunctional on 2de). 2de was performed in 5 views and wall motion scores (WMS) assigned: 1 (normal) 103 segments, 2 (hypokinetic) 93 segments, 3 (akinetic) 87 segments. MRI was used to measure end systolic wall thickness (ESWT), end diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) and percentage systolic wall thickening (SWT%) in the plane of the 2de and to assess WMS in the same planes visually. No patient had a clinical ischemic event between the tests. Results: visual assessment of wall motion by 2de and MRI showed moderate agreement (kappa = 0.425). Resting 2de wall motion correlated significantly (p

Radial artery pulse upstroke is not a good marker of left ventricular dysfunction: A comparison of radial tonometry, angiographic and echocardiographic measures of dP/dt

The first derivative of pressure over time (dP/dt) is a marker of left ventricular (LV) systolic function that can be assessed during cardiac catheterization and echocardiography. Radial artery dP/dt (Radial-dP/dt) has been proposed as a possible marker of LV systolic function (Nichols & O’Rourke, McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries) and we sought to test this hypothesis. Methods:We compared simultaneously recorded RadialdP/ dt (by high-fidelity tonometry) with LV-dP/dt (by highfidelity catheter and echocardiography parameters analogous to LV-dP/dt) in patients without aortic valve disease. In study 1, beat to beat Radial-dP/dt and LV-dP/dt were recorded at rest and during supine exercise in 12 males (aged 61±12 years) undergoing cardiac catheterization. In study 2, 2D-echocardiography and Radial-dP/dt were recorded in 59 patients (43 men; aged 64±10 years) at baseline and peak dobutamine-induced stress. Three measures at the basal septum were taken as being analogous to LV-dP/dt: (1) peak systolic strain rate, (2) strain rate (SR-dP/dt), and (3) tissue velocity during isovolumic contraction. Results: Study 1; there was a significant difference between resting LV-dP/dt (1461±383 mmHg/s) and Radial-dP/dt (1182±319 mmHg/s; P < 0.001), and a poor, but statistically significant, correlation between the variables (R2 = 0.006; P < 0.001) due to the high number of data points compared (n = 681). Similar results were observed during exercise. Study 2; there was a moderate association between baseline Radial-dP/dt and SRdP/ dt (R2 =−0.17; P < 0.01), but no significant relationship between Radial-dP/dt and all other echocardiographic measures analogous to LV-dP/dt at rest or peak stress (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The radial pressurewaveform is not a reliable marker of LV contractility.