Ontological clarity and comprehension in health data models

Conceptual modeling forms an important part of systems analysis. If this is done incorrectly or incompletely, there can be serious implications for the resultant system, specifically in terms of rework and useability. One approach to improving the conceptual modelling process is to evaluate how well the model represents reality. Emergence of the Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) ontological model introduced a platform to classify and compare the grammar of conceptual modelling languages. This work applies the BWW theory to a real world example in the health arena. The general practice computing group data model was developed using the Barker Entity Relationship Modelling technique. We describe an experiment, grounded in ontological theory, which evaluates how well the GPCG data model is understood by domain experts. The results show that with the exception of the use of entities to represent events, the raw model is better understood by domain experts

Use of routine data for determination of the population pharmacokinetics and enteral biovailability of phenytoin in neonates and infants with seizures

Objective: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics and the enteral bioavailability of phenytoin in neonates and infants with seizures. Methods: Data (5 mg kg-1 day-1) from 83 patients were obtained retrospectively from the medical records following written ethical approval. A one-compartment model was fitted to the data using NONMEM with FOCE-interaction. Between-subject variability (BSV) and interoccasion variability (IOV) were modelled exponentially together with a log transform-both-sides exponential residual unexplained variance (RUV) model. Covariates in nested models were screened for significance (X2, 1, 0.01). Model validity was determined by bootstrapping with replacement (N=500 samples) from the dataset. Results: The parameters of final pharmacokinetic were: Clearance (L h-1) = 0.826.(current Weight [kg]/70)0.75.(1+0.0692.(Postnatal age [days]-11)); Volume of distribution (L) = 74.2.(current Weight [kg]/70); Enteral bioavailability = 0.76; Absorption rate constant (h-1) = 0.167. BSV for clearance and volume of distribution were 74.2% and 65.6%, respectively. The IOV in clearance was 54.4%. The RUV was 51.1%. Final model parameters deviated from mean bootstrap estimates by