Localization of a brain sulfotransferase, SULT4A1, in the human and rat brain: An immunohistochemical study

Cytosolic sulfotransferases are believed to play a role in the neuromodulation of certain neurotransmitters and drugs. To date, four cytosolic sulfotransferases have been shown to be expressed in human brain. Recently, a novel human brain sulfotransferase has been identified and characterized, although its role and localization in the brain are unknown. Here we present the first immunohistochemical (IHC) localization of SULT4A1 in human brain using an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody raised against recombinant human SULT4A1. These results are supported and supplemented by the IHC localization of SULT4A1 in rat brain. In both human and rat brains, strong reactivity was found in several brain regions, including cerebral cortex, cerebellum, pituitary, and brainstem. Specific signal was entirely absent on sections for which preimmune serum from the corresponding animal, processed in the same way as the postimmune serum, was used in the primary screen. The findings from this study may assist in determining the physiological role of this SULT isoform.

Identification of a minimal promoter sequence for the human N-acetyltransferase Type I gene that binds AP-1 (activator protein 1) and YY-1 (Yin and Yang 1)

Human N-acetyltransferase Type I (NAT1) catalyses the acetylation of many aromatic amine and hydrazine compounds and it has been implicated in the catabolism of folic acid. The enzyme is widely expressed in the body, although there are considerable differences in the level of activity between tissues. A search of the mRNA databases revealed the presence of several NAT1 transcripts in human tissue that appear to be derived from different promoters. Because little is known about NAT1 gene regulation, the present study was undertaken to characterize one of the putative promoter sequences of the NAT1 gene located just upstream of the coding region. We show with reverse-transcriptase PCR that mRNA transcribed from this promoter (Promoter 1) is present in a variety of human cell-lines, but not in quiescent peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Using deletion mutant constructs, we identified a 20 bp sequence located 245 bases upstream of the translation start site which was sufficient for basal NAT1 expression. It comprised an AP-1 (activator protein 1)-binding site, flanked on either side by a TCATT motif. Mutational analysis showed that the AP-1 site and the 3' TCATT sequence were necessary for gene expression, whereas the 5' TCATT appeared to attenuate promoter activity. Electromobility shift assays revealed two specific bands made up by complexes of c-Fos/Fra, c-Jun, YY-1 (Yin and Yang 1) and possibly Oct-1. PMA treatment enhanced expression from the NAT1 promoter via the AP-1-binding site. Furthermore, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PMA increased endogenous NAT1 activity and induced mRNA expression from Promoter I, suggesting that it is functional in vivo.

The human sulfotransferase SULT1A1 gene is regulated in a synergistic manner by Sp1 and GA binding protein

Human sulfotransferase SULT1A1 is an important phase II xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme that is highly expressed in the liver and mediates the sulfonation of drugs, carcinogens, and steroids. Until this study, the transcriptional regulation of the SULT1A subfamily had been largely unexplored. Preliminary experiments in primary human hepatocytes showed that SULT1A mRNA levels were not changed in response to nuclear receptor activators, such as dexamethasone and 3-methylcolanthrene, unlike other metabolizing enzymes. Using HepG2 cells, the high activity of the TATA-less SULT1A1 promoter was shown to be dependent on the presence of Sp1 and Ets transcription factor binding sites (EBS), located within - 112 nucleotides from the transcriptional start site. The homologous promoter of the closely related SULT1A3 catecholamine sulfotransferase, which is expressed at negligible levels in the adult liver, displayed 70% less activity than SULT1A1. This was shown to be caused by a two-base pair difference in the EBS. The Ets transcription factor GA binding protein (GABP) was shown to bind the SULT1A1 EBS and could transactivate the SULT1A1 promoter in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. Cotransfection of Sp1 could synergistically enhance GABP-mediated activation by 10-fold. Although Sp1 and GABP alone could induce SULT1A3 promoter activity, the lack of the EBS on this promoter prevented a synergistic interaction between the two factors. This study reports the first insight into the transcriptional regulation of the SULT1A1 gene and identifies a crucial difference in regulation of the closely related SULT1A3 gene, which accounts for the two enzymes' differential expression patterns observed in the adult liver.

Effects of (-)-RO363 at human atrial beta-adrenoceptor subtypes, the human cloned beta(3)-adrenoceptor and rodent intestinal beta(3)-adrenoceptors

1 Chronic treatment of patients with beta-blockers causes atrial inotropic hyperresponsiveness through beta(2)-adrenoceptors, 5-HT4 receptors and H-2-receptors but apparently not through beta(1)-adrenoceptors despite data claiming an increased beta(1)-adrenoceptor density from homogenate binding studies. We have addressed the question of beta(1)-adrenoceptor sensitivity by determining the inotropic potency and intrinsic activity of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective partial agonist (-)-RO363 and by carrying out both homogenate binding and quantitative beta-adrenoceptor autoradiography in atria obtained from patients treated or not treated with beta-blockers. In the course of the experiments it became apparent that (-)-RO363 also may cause agonistic effects through the third atrial beta-adrenoceptor. To assess whether (-)-RO363 also caused agonistic effects through beta(3)-adrenoceptors we studied its relaxant effects in rat colon and guinea-pig ileum, as well as receptor binding and adenylyl cyclase stimulation of chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human beta(3)-adrenoceptors. 2 beta-Adrenoceptors were labelled with (-)-[I-125]-cyanopindolol. The density of both beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors was unchanged in the 2 groups, as assessed with both quantitative receptor autoradiography and homogenate binding. The affinities of (-)-RO363 for beta(1)-adrenoceptors (pK(i) = 8.0-7.7) and beta(2)-adrenoceptors (pK(i) = 6.1-5.8) were not significantly different in the two groups. 3 (-)-RO363 increased atrial force with a pEC(50) of 8.2 (beta-blocker treated) and 8.0 (non-beta-blocker treated) and intrinsic activity with respect to (-)-isoprenaline of 0.80 (beta-blocker treated) and 0.54 (non-beta-blocker treated) (P<0.001) and with respect to Ca2+ (7 mM) of 0.65 (beta-blocker treated) and 0.45 (non-beta-blocker treated) (P<0.01). The effects of (-)-RO363 were resistant to antagonism by the beta(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, ICI 118,551 (50 nM). The effects of 0.3-10 nM (-)-RO363 were antagonized by 3-10 nM of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective antagonist CGP 20712A. The effects of 20-1000 nM (-)-RO363 were partially resistant to antagonism by 30-300 nM CGP 20712A. 4 (-)-RO363 relaxed the rat colon, partially precontracted by 30 mM KCl, with an intrinsic activity of 0.97 compared to (-)-isoprenaline. The concentration-effect curve to (-)-RO363 revealed 2 components, one antagonized by (-)-propranolol (200 nM) with pEC(50)=8.5 and fraction 0.66, the other resistant to (-)-propranolol (200 nM) with pEC(50)=5.6 and fraction 0.34 of maximal relaxation. 5 (-)-RO363 relaxed the longitudinal muscle of guinea-pig ileum, precontracted by 0.5 mu M histamine, with intrinsic activity of 1.0 compared to (-)-isoprenaline and through 2 components, one antagonized by (-)-propranolol (200 nM) with pEC(50)=8.7 and fraction 0.67, the other resistant to (-)-propranolol with pEC(50)=4.9 and fraction 0.33 of maximal relaxation. 6 (-)-RO363 stimulated the adenylyl cyclase of CHO cells expressing human beta(3)-adrenoceptors with pEC(50)=5.5 and intrinsic activity 0.74 with respect to (-)-isoprenaline (pEC(50)=5.9). (-)-RO363 competed for binding with [I-125]cyanopindolol at human beta(3)-adrenoceptors transfected into CHO cells with pK(i)=4.5. (-)-Isoprenaline (pk(i)=5.2) and (-)-CGP 12177A (pK(i)=6.1) also competed for binding at human beta(2)-adrenoceptors. 7 We conclude that under conditions used in this study, (-)-RO363 is a potent partial agonist for human beta(1)- and beta(3)-adrenoceptors and appears also to activate the third human atrial beta-adrenoceptor. (-)-RO363 relaxes mammalian gut through both beta(1)- and beta(3)-adrenoceptors. (-)-RO363, used as a beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective tool, confirms previous findings with (-)-noradrenaline that beta(1)-adrenoceptor mediated atrial effects are only slightly enhanced by chronic treatment of patients with beta-blockers. Chronic treatment with beta(1)-adrenoceptor-selective blockers does not significantly increase the density of human atrial beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors.

Characterisation of the recently cloned rat noradrenaline transporter - Comparison with bovine and human transporters

The aims of this study were to characterize the recently cloned rat norepinephrine transporter (NET) in more detail and in particular to study possible species differences in its pharmacological properties compared with the human and bovine NETs. The study was carried out by measuring the uptake of [3H]norepinephrine in COS-7 cells expressing the NET after transient transfection with rat, human, or bovine NET cDNA. There were small but significant differences between the rat NET and the human or bovine NETs with respect to the affinities of sodium ions (greater for rat than for bovine) of the substrates norepinephrine, epinephrine, and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (greater for human than for rat), and of the inhibitor cocaine (greater for human and bovine than for rat), whereas the affinities of dopamine and of most inhibitors, including tricyclic antidepressants, showed no species differences. The fact that the affinities for some substrates, cocaine and sodium ions exhibited small but significant interspecies differences among the rat, human, and bovine NETs suggests that ligand recognition, the translocation process, and sodium ion dependence are influenced differentially by just a few amino acid exchanges in the primary sequences of the transporters. On the other hand, the lack of any major differences in the pharmacological properties of the rat, human, and bovine NETs in this study suggests that data obtained in previous studies on rat tissues and bovine cells can be extrapolated, in all except the most quantitative analyses, to the properties of the human NET.