Prevention of Cervical Cancer Through Papillomavirus Vaccination

A subset of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) promote anogenital malignancy, including cervical cancer, and prevention and treatment strategies that reflect the causal role of HPV are being developed. Vaccines based on HPV virus-like particles induce genotype-specific virus-neutralizing antibody and prevent infection with HPV1. Persistent papillomavirus infection is required for the development of papillomavirus-associated cancer and, therefore, therapeutic vaccines are being developed to eliminate established papillomavirus infection. Such vaccines test principles for the growing field of tumour-antigen-specific immunotherapy. This article reviews progress in the field and draws conclusions for the development of future prophylactic and therapeutic viral vaccines.

ISCOMATRIX (TM) adjuvant: An adjuvant suitable for use in anticancer vaccines

Human Papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 oncoproteins are associated with cervical cancer development and progression and can therefore be used as target antigens for cancer immunotherapy. In this study we evaluated the immunogenicity in mice, of different vaccine formulations using recombinant HPV16 derived E6E7 or E7GST fusion proteins. When co-administered with ISCOMATRIX(TM) adjuvant, these E6E7 proteins consistently induced E7 specific CTL, in vivo tumor protection, antibody and DTH responses. ISCOMATRIX(TM) adjuvant has been developed for use in the formulation of novel human vaccines and has been evaluated for safety and toxicity in human trials. A formulation containing aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)(3)) gave a lesser degree of E7 specific antibody, and no local E7 specific CTL response but similar DTH and tumor protection. These findings demonstrate the potential of ISCOMATRIX(TM) adjuvant to stimulate both cellular and humoral immune responses to endogenously processed target antigens, and hence is the preferred adjuvant when CTL responses are desirable. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

A polytope DNA vaccine elicits multiple effector and memory CTL responses and protects against human papillomavirus 16 E7-expressing tumour

Vaccine-induced CD8 T cells directed to tumourspecific antigens are recognised as important components of protective and therapeutic immunity against tumours. Where tumour antigens have pathogenic potential or where immunogenic epitopes are lost from tumours, development of subunit vaccines consisting of multiple individual epitopes is an attractive alternative to immunising with whole tumour antigen. In the present study we investigate the efficacy of two DNA-based multiepitope('polytope') vaccines containing murine (H-2(b)) and human (HLA-A* 0201)-restricted epitopes of the E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16, in eliciting tumour-protective cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses. We show that the first of these polytopes elicited powerful effector CTL responses ( measured by IFN-gamma ELISpot) and long-lived memory CTL responses ( measured by functional CTL assay and tetramers) in immunised mice. The responses could be boosted by immunisation with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the polytope. Responses induced by immunisation with polytope DNA alone partially protected against infection with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the polytope. Complete protection was afforded against challenge with an E7-expressing tumour, and reduced growth of nascent tumours was observed. A second polytope differing in the exact composition and order of CTL epitopes, and lacking an inserted endoplasmic reticulum targeting sequence and T-helper epitope, induced much poorer CTL responses and failed to protect against tumour challenge. These observations indicate the validity of a DNA polytope vaccine approach to human papillomavirus E7 - associated carcinoma, and underscore the importance of design in polytope vaccine construction.

Chapter 8 HPV vaccines

Vaccines to prevent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) will help protect women against cervical cancer, and some are likely to be available within the next year. One vaccine, a quadrivalent vaccine against HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 and known as Garadsil ©(Merck &Co., Inc), was approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of cervical cancer, cervical cancer precursors and vulval and vaginal cancer precursors associated with HPV 16 and 18 in June 2006. In addition, the vaccine has been approved for the prevention of genital warts and low grade cervical lesions e.g. cervical intraepithelial neoplasia1. The main vaccines components are recombinant viral capsid proteins assembled into virus-like particles and alum-based adjuvants. If given before HPV infection, the vaccines, which induce HPV type-specific, virus-neutralizing antibodies, have proven safe and highly effective at preventing HPV infection and its clinical consequences, including high-grade cervical lesions. Their use should not immediately alter existing screening programs for cervical cancer, however. Because they incorporate only the 2 HPV types most commonly associated with cervical cancer (HPV-16 and HPV-18), they can only prevent about 70% of cervical cancers. Vaccines to treat existing HPV infection are under development but are unlikely to become clinically available in the near future.

Prophylactic HPV vaccines: Underlying mechanisms

Human papillomavirus virus-like particles (HPV VLP) can be generated by the synthesis and self-assembly in vitro of the major virus capsid protein L1. HPV L1 VLPs are morphologically and antigenically almost identical to native virions, and this technology has been exploited to produce HPV L1 VLP subunit vaccines. The vaccines elicit high titres of anti-L I VLP antibodies that persist at levels 10 times that of natural infections for at least 48 months. At present the assumption is that the protection achieved by these vaccines against incident HPV infection and HPV-associated ano-genital pathology is mediated via serum neutralising Immunoglobulin G (IgG). However, since there have been very few vaccine failures thus far, immune correlates of protection have not been established. The available evidence is that the immunodominant neutralising antibodies generated by L1 VLPs are type-specific and are not cross-neutralising, although highly homologous HPV pairs share minor cross-neutralisation epitopes. Important issues remaining to be addressed include the duration of protection and genotype replacement. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DNA packaging by L1 and L2 capsid proteins of bovine papillomavirus type 1

Encapsidation of circular DNA by papillomavirus capsid protein was investigated in Cos-1 cells. Plasmids carrying both an SV40 origin of replication (or) and an E. coli on were introduced into Cos-1 cells by DNA transfection. PV capsid proteins were supplied in trans by recombinant vaccinia viruses. Pseudovirions were purified from infected cells and their packaged DNA was extracted and used to transform E. coil as an indication of packaging efficacy. VLPs assembled from BPV-1 L1 alone packaged little plasmid DNA, whereas VLPs assembled from BPV-1 L1+L2 packaged plasmid DNA at least 50 times more effectively. BPV-1 L1+L2 VLPs packaged a plasmid containing BPV-1 sequence 8.2 +/- 3.1 times more effectively than a plasmid without BW sequences. Using a series of plasmid constructs comprising a core BPV-1 sequence and spacer DNA it was demonstrated that BW VLPs could accommodate a maximum of about 10.2 kb of plasmid DNA, and that longer closed circular DNA was truncated to produce less dense virions with shorter plasmid sequences. The present study suggests that packaging of genome within PV virions involves interaction of L2 protein with specific DNA sequences, and demonstrates that PV pseudovirions have the potential to be used as DNA delivery vectors for plasmids of up to 10.2 kb. (C) 1998 Academic Press.

Simplifying the molecular mechanisms of human papillomavirus

The human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are associated with several human epithelial diseases. These diseases are confined to cutaneous and mucosal epithelia and comprise papillomas (warts) and benign or malignant neoplasms. Globally, infection by HPVs presents a considerable health problem given that at any one time approximately 10% of the population may have warts of one form or another. Of more serious concern is the prevalence of HPV-associated cervical carcinoma. It is estimated that 500,000 new cases of cervical neoplasia are diagnosed per year (primarily squamous carcinomas). Thus, HPV-associated cancer represents one of the most common cancers afflicting women and is one of the three most common causes of cancer death among women globally.(15) Although some genotypes of human papillomaviruses are clearly associated with the development of cancer (in particular, HPVs 16 and 18) these viruses share significant structural and functional similarity to the nononcogenic genotypes, and one of the puzzles of HPV biology is why essentially similar viruses vary so widely in their oncogenic potential.

Mucosal immunisation with papillomavirus virus-like particles elicits systemic and mucosal immunity in mice

It has been shown previously that recombinant virus-like particles (VLPs) of papillomavirus can induce VLP-specific humoral and cellular immune responses following parenteral administration. To test whether mucosal administration of bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) VLPs could produce mucosal as well as systemic immune responses to VLPs, 50 mu g chimeric BPV1 VLPs containing an HPV16 E7 CTL epitope (BPVL1/E7 VLP) was administered intranasally to mice. After two immunisations, L1-specific serum IgG and IgA were observed. L1-specific IgG and IgA were also found in respiratory and vaginal secretions. Both serum and mucosal antibody inhibited papillomavirus VLP-induced agglutination of RBC, indicating that the antibody induced by mucosal immunisation may recognize conformational determinants associated with virus neutralisation. For comparison, VLPs were given intramuscularly, and systemic and mucosal immune responses were generally comparable following systemic or mucosal delivery. However, intranasal administration of VLP induced significantly higher local IgA response in lung, suggesting that mucosally delivered HPV VLP may be more effective for mediating local mucosal immune responses. Intranasal immunisation with HPV6b L1 VLP produced VLP-specific T proliferative responses in splenocytes, and immunisation with BPVL1 VLP containing an HPV16 E7 CTL epitope induced E7-specific CTL responses. We conclude that immunisation with papillomavirus VLPs via mucosal and intramuscular routes, without adjuvant, can elicit specific antibody at mucosal surfaces and also systemic VLP epitope specific T cell responses. These findings suggest that mucosally delivered VLPs may offer an alternative HPV VLP vaccine strategy for inducing protective humoral immunity to anogenital HPV infection, together with cell-mediated immune responses to eliminate any cells which become infected. (C) 1998 Academic Press.

Potential strategies utilised by papillomavirus to evade host immunity

The co-evolution of papillomaviruses (PV) and their mammalian hosts has produced mechanisms by which PV might avoid specific and non-specific host immune responses. Low level expression of PV proteins in infected basal epithelial cells, together with an absence of inflammation and of virus-induced cell lysis, restricts the opportunity for effective PV protein presentation to immunocytes by dendritic cells. Additionally, PV early proteins, by a range of mechanisms, may restrict the efficacy of antigen presentation by these cells. Should an immune response be induced to PV antigens, resting keratinocytes (KC) appear resistant to interferon-gamma-enhanced mechanisms of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL)-mediated lysis, and expression of PV antigens by resting KC can tolerise PV-specific CTL. Thus, KC, in the absence of inflammation, may represent an immunologically privileged site for PV infection. Together, these mechanisms play a parr in allowing persistence of PV-induced proliferative skin lesions for months to years, even in immunocompetent hosts.

Papillomavirus virus-like particles for the delivery of multiple cytotoxic T cell epitopes

Chimeric papillomavirus (PV) virus-like particles (VLPs) based on the bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) L1 protein were constructed by replacing the 23-carboxyl-terminal amino acids of the BPV1 major protein L1 with an artificial polytope minigene, containing known CTL epitopes of human PV16 E7 protein, HIV IIIB gp120 P18, Nef, and reverse transcriptase (RT) proteins, and an HPV16 E7 linear B epitope. The CTL epitopes were restricted by three different MHC class 1 alleles (H-2(b), H-2(d), HLA-A*0201). The chimeric L1 protein assembled into VLPs when expressed in SF-9 cells by recombinant baculovirus. After immunization of mice with polytope VLPs in the absence of adjuvant, serum antibodies were detected which reacted with both polytope VLPs and wild-type BPV1L1 VLPs, in addition to the HPV16E7 linear B cell epitope. CTL precursors specific for the HPV16 E7, HIV P18, and RT CTL epitopes were also detected in the spleen of immunized mice. Polytope VLPs can thus deliver multiple B and T epitopes as immunogens to the MHC class I and class II pathways, extending the utility of VLPs as self-adjuvanting immunogen delivery systems. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

The human papillomavirus E7 protein is able to inhibit the antiviral and anti-growth functions of interferon-alpha

It is now well recognized that cervical cancer is caused by infection with certain human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes and while interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is used to treat HPV-infected lesions, HPV appears to have developed a means to avoid the effects of IFN-alpha. Clinically, resistance appears to be associated with the expression of the E7 oncoprotein. Here we investigated the effects of expression in cells of the E7 protein from high- and low-risk papillomavirus subtypes on a range of responses to IFN-alpha. 2fTGH, a cell line dependent on IFN-alpha for growth in selection medium, grew significantly less well in the presence of E7, and the antiproliferative effects of IFN-alpha upon epithelial cells was lost upon E7 expression. The antiviral effects of IFN-alpha were abrogated in E7-expressing cells. Loss of response to IFN-alpha was found to occur in both high- and low-risk papillomaviruses. Finally, deletion of amino acids 21-24 of HPV type 16 E7 protein partially reversed repression. We conclude that E7 inhibits the functional effects of IFN-alpha and that this property is shared by all HPV subtypes tested. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Association of bovine papillomavirus type 1 with microtubules

Transport of BPV-1 virus from the cell membrane to the nucleus was studied in vitro in CV-1 cells. At reduced temperature (4 degreesC). BPV-I binding to CV-1 cells was unaffected but there was no transport of virions across the cytosol. Electron microscopy showed BPV-I virions in association with microtubules in the cytoplasm, a finding confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation of L1 protein and tubulin. Internalization of virus was unimpaired in cells treated with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole but virions were retained in cytoplasmic vesicles and not transported to the nucleus. We conclude that a microtubule transport mechanism in CV-1 cells moves intact BPV-1 virions from the cell surface to the nuclear membrane. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16 expressed constitutively in the epidermis has no effect on E7-specific B- or Th-repertoires or on the immune response induced or sustained after immunization with E7 protein

A line of FVB (H-2(q)) mice transgenic for the E6/E7 open reading frames of Human Papillomavirus type 16 driven from the alpha-A crystallin promoter expresses E7 mRNA in lens and skin epithelium. E7 protein is detectable in adult skin, coinciding with the development or inflammatory skin disease, which progresses to papillomata and squamous carcinomata in some mice. By examining the outcome of parenteral immunization with E7 protein, we sought to determine whether endogenous expression of E7 in skin had induced a preexisting immune outcome, i.e., specific immunity or tolerance, or whether the mice remain naive (''ignorant'') to E7. Our data show that the antibody response to defined E7 B-epitopes, the proliferative response to Th epitopes, and the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to whole E7 did not differ between groups or young and old E6/E7 transgenic mice (likely having different degrees of lifetime exposure to E7 protein) or between E6/E7-transgenic and nontransgenic parental strain control mice. Although an E7-specific CTL response could not be induced in the H-2(q) background of these mice, incorporation of a D-b allele into the genome allowed comparison of D-b-restricted CTL responses in E6/E7 transgenic and nontransgenic mice. Experiments indicated that the E7-immunization-induced CTL response did not differ significantly between E6/E7 transgenic and nontransgenic mice. We interpret these results to indicate that in spite of expression of E7 protein in adult skin, E6/E7 transgenic mice remain immunologically naive (ignorant) of E7 epitopes presented by immunization. (C) 1997 Academic Press.