Patched1 functions as a gatekeeper by promoting cell cycle progression

Mutations in the Hedgehog receptor, Patched 1 (Ptch1), have been linked to both familial and sporadic forms of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), leading to the hypothesis that loss of Ptch1 function is sufficient for tumor progression. By combining conditional knockout technology with the inducible activity of the Keratin6 promoter, we provide in vivo evidence that loss of Ptch1 function from the basal cell population of mouse skin is sufficient to induce rapid skin tumor formation, reminiscent of human BCC. Elimination of Ptch1 does not promote the nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and does not induce ectopic activation or expression of Notch pathway constituents. In the absence of Ptch1, however, a large proportion of basal cells exhibit nuclear accumulation of the cell cycle regulators cyclin D1 and B1. Collectively, our data suggest that Ptch1 likely functions as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting G(1)-S phase and G(2)-M phase cell cycle progression, and the rapid onset of tumor progression clearly indicates Ptch1 functions as a gatekeeper. In addition, we note the high frequency and rapid onset of tumors in this mouse model makes it an ideal system for testing therapeutic strategies, such as Patched pathway inhibitors.

Heterogeneity of MUC1 expression by human breast carcinoma cell lines in vivo and in vitro

Increased expression of the epithelial mucin MUC1 has been linked to tumor aggressiveness in human breast carcinoma. Recent studies have demonstrated that overexpression of MUC1 interferes with cell-substrate and cell-cell adhesion by masking cell surface integrins and E-cadherin. Additionally, the cytoplasmic tail of MUC1 is involved in signal transduction and interactions with catenins. In the present study, we have examined the in vitro expression of MUC1 mRNA and protein in a panel of 14 human breast cancer cell lines using northern blotting, western blotting, immunocytochemistry, and flow cytometry. Considerable variability of expression was noted not only between cell lines but also within several individual lines. Many cell lines such as BT 20, KPL-1, and T47D expressed abundant MUC1 whilst others such as MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 showed intermediate expression, and MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-453 expressed very low levels. Low levels of MUC1 expression were associated with decreased expression of cytokeratin and increased expression of vimentin. Additionally, 12 of the cell lines were established as xenografts in immunocompromised (SCID) mice, and MUC1 expression in both the primary tumors as well as metastases was assessed immunohistochemically. In general, in vivo expression mirrored in vitro expression, although there was reduced in vivo expression in T47D and ZR-75-1 xenografts. Although we showed no correlation between tumorigenicity or metastasis and MUC1 expression, this study will assist development of experimental models to assess the influence of MUC1 of on breast cancer progression.