Disturbances in microbiota - cause or effect?

IBD are a group of complex polygenetic diseases also involving environmental factors. Evidence for a role for bacteria in IBD include an increased abundance of mucosa-associated bacteria in IBD (which occurs even where there is no intestinal inflammation), and the positive impact of antibiotics on the progress of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) of the pouch - pouchitis. Bacteria are necessary for most animal models of IBD. The increased abundance of mucosal bacteria in IBD is not non-specific because while some mucosal bacteria are more abundant this is not the case for all mucosal bacteria including the very abundant Bacteroides vulgatus. On the other hand, antibiotic treatments are not curative, and the humoral immune Ig response to bacterial antigens which is more evident in CD, appears to be polyclonal. While this argues against a role for specific bacteria causing a classical infection, certain mucosal bacteria may damage the mucosal barrier. This would promote invasion by other commensal mucosal bacteria triggering an immune response. Altered adaptive, and to a lesser extent, innate immunity have been extensively studied, and genetic defects in the CARD15 (or NOD2) gene that encodes a bacterial sensing protein modulating innate and adaptive immunity are strongly associated with ileal CD. However, the penetrance of the homozygous CARD15 frameshift mutation, which is the most strongly CD-associated genotype, is very low with only 4% of humans with this developing CD. Furthermore, mice with the same defects in CARD15 do not develop spontaneous ileitis or colitis. Therefore, there have to be other aetiological factor(s). Altered permeability is a consistent finding in subclinical CD. There are other data to suggest that altered mucin is an early event in UC. We propose that the pathogenesis of IBD is multifactorial involving specific mucosal bacteria, defective barrier function and altered mucosal immunity in an aetiology triangle.

Children and economic development: Family size, gender preferences and human capital formation - theory and Indian cases

In the light of Gary Becker's economic theory of the family, considers how economic cost and benefit factors can influence the size of families that parents decide to have. Some support for the importance of such factors is found from results of structured interviews with wives in Kondh-dominated villages in western Orissa. These results are at variance with the hypothesis of Malthus about population growth. Factors that may alter the optimal family size as development proceeds are discussed. It is found in our sampling that, on the whole, there is a preference for daughters rather than sons although this is not as strong in the Kondh-dominated villages as in poor villages in the Santal tribal belt of West Bengal. While in the Kondh-dominated villages some discrimination in access to education in favour of boys compared to girls is present, little such or no such discrimination occurs in relation to access to food and medical attention. In the villages surveyed in the West Bengal Santal tribal belt, discrimination in favour of boys is more pronounced than in the Kondh-dominated area in Orissa. While economic considerations help to explain gender discrimination between boys and girls, we find that social and cultural factors also play a major role. Parents in a similar economic situation seem to display substantially different patterns of gender discrimination between children depending on their social and cultural content. It seems that the extent to which economic theories of the family explain family preferences and behaviour depend significantly on the social and cultural context in which they are to be applied.