166 resultados para User-Designer Collaboration, Problem Restructuring, Scenario Building
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (19)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (38)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (70)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (27)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (6)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (38)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (79)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (6)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (47)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (9)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (29)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (6)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (72)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (10)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (166)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
To identify why reconceptualization of the problem is difficult in chronic pain, this study aimed to evaluate whether (1) health professionals and patients can understand currently accurate information about the neurophysiology of pain and (2) health professionals accurately estimate the ability of patients to understand the neurophysiology of pain. Knowledge tests were completed by 276 patients with chronic pain and 288 professionals either before (untrained) or after (trained) education about the neurophysiology of pain. Professionals estimated typical patient performance on the test. Untrained participants performed poorly (mean +/- standard deviation, 55% +/- 19% and 29% +/- 12% for professionals and patients, respectively), compared to their trained counterparts (78% +/- 21% and 61% +/- 19%, respectively). The estimated patient score (46% +/- 18%) was less than the actual patient score (P < .005). The results suggest that professionals and patients can understand the neurophysiology of pain but professionals underestimate patients' ability to understand. The implications are that (1) a poor knowledge of currently accurate information about pain and (2) the underestimation of patients' ability to understand currently accurate information about pain represent barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain within the clinical and lay arenas. (C) 2003 by the American Pain Society.