1 resultado para Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
em The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (11)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (6)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (167)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (46)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (60)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (1)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (84)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (82)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (9)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (182)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (37)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (11)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
[Excerpt] In this issue’s “From the Editor,” I describe a new review policy and process for both authors and reviewers. Authors should find that this new policy and process provides them with faster editorial decisions, higher quality feedback, and greater clarity about required revisions, as well as greater freedom to disagree with reviewers and to write the papers they (the authors) want. Reviewers should find that this new policy and process saves them from having to review obviously flawed papers and from having to review different versions of the same paper over and over again.