1 resultado para Lot sizing and scheduling problems
em The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (17)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CamPuce - an association for the promotion of science and humanities in African Countries (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (53)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (12)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (15)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (27)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (108)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (33)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (27)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (41)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (21)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (61)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (131)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (85)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (74)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
An extensive literature exists on the problems of daily (shift) and weekly (tour) labor scheduling. In representing requirements for employees in these problems, researchers have used formulations based either on the model of Dantzig (1954) or on the model of Keith (1979). We show that both formulations have weakness in environments where management knows, or can attempt to identify, how different levels of customer service affect profits. These weaknesses results in lower-than-necessary profits. This paper presents a New Formulation of the daily and weekly Labor Scheduling Problems (NFLSP) designed to overcome the limitations of earlier models. NFLSP incorporates information on how changing the number of employees working in each planning period affects profits. NFLP uses this information during the development of the schedule to identify the number of employees who, ideally, should be working in each period. In an extensive simulation of 1,152 service environments, NFLSP outperformed the formulations of Dantzig (1954) and Keith (1979) at a level of significance of 0.001. Assuming year-round operations and an hourly wage, including benefits, of $6.00, NFLSP's schedules were $96,046 (2.2%) and $24,648 (0.6%) more profitable, on average, than schedules developed using the formulations of Danzig (1954) and Keith (1979), respectively. Although the average percentage gain over Keith's model was fairly small, it could be much larger in some real cases with different parameters. In 73 and 100 percent of the cases we simulated NFLSP yielded a higher profit than the models of Keith (1979) and Danzig (1954), respectively.