1 resultado para Authors, Mexican.
em The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (19)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (5)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (11)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (27)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (15)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (46)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Harvard University (12)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (5)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (10)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (25)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (75)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Vicerrectoría de Investigación de la Universidad de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo España (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (12)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (464)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
[Excerpt] In this issue’s “From the Editor,” I describe a new review policy and process for both authors and reviewers. Authors should find that this new policy and process provides them with faster editorial decisions, higher quality feedback, and greater clarity about required revisions, as well as greater freedom to disagree with reviewers and to write the papers they (the authors) want. Reviewers should find that this new policy and process saves them from having to review obviously flawed papers and from having to review different versions of the same paper over and over again.