4 resultados para Historical interpretation

em South Carolina State Documents Depository


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annually, the association publishes a journal, The Proceedings, which consists of papers presented at the annual meeting. Loyalism in Charleston, 1761-1784 by Ella Pettit Levett – University of Chicago Inland Navigation in South Carolina and Traffic on the Columbia Canal by Carl L. Epting – Columbia College An Interpretation of Mexican Socialism of the Last Two Decades by W. H. Callcott – Duke University

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annually, the association publishes a journal, The Proceedings, which consists of papers presented at the annual meeting. The Horizontal Axis: Italo-Yugoslav Relations as Affected by the Anschluss 1937-1938 by David B. McElroy The South Carolina Public Records as Sources for the Revisionist Interpretation of the American Revolution by Wylma Wates The Opinions of Editor William Gilmore Simms of the Southern Quarterly Review, 1849-1854 by Frank W. Ryan The Up-Country Academies of Moses Waddel by Hugh C. Bailey

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annually, the association publishes a journal, The Proceedings, which consists of papers presented at the annual meeting. The Chinese Labor Issue in British Politics, 1904-1907 by E. B. Hannum – University of South Alabama A Statistical and Historical Analysis and Interpretation of British By-Elections, 1906-1909 by Michael C. Griffin Slavery and the Presence of Free Will by William F. Steirer Reconsideration: The University of South Carolina during Reconstruction by John Herbert Roper – University of North Carolina

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This document contains a speech by John L. McLaurin, representative of South Carolina. Sections of the speech include: sectionalism exposed, the bill might have been defeated, the south plundered of its rights, not a protectionist, fraudulent demands of New England, Hon. Randolph Tucker, Hon. W.R. Morrison, and Hon. R.Q. Mills strangers to the doctrine in 1882, a tariff for revenue against the doctrine of free raw material, don’t want Cleveland’s interpretation, contest of schedules, and my remedy.