1 resultado para unintended consequences
em SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (16)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (68)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (140)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (60)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (8)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (20)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (108)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (15)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (27)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (18)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (23)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (15)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (109)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (108)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (16)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
Resumo:
Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.