1 resultado para unintended births
em SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (5)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (27)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Brock University, Canada (14)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (22)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (20)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (61)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (5)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Harvard University (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (9)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (9)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (5)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (67)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (44)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (27)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (2)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (23)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (94)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (21)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (153)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (23)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.