1 resultado para Surveying
em SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (15)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (56)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (16)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (128)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (6)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (10)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (12)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (20)
- Memorial University Research Repository (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (47)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (20)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (132)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (65)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (151)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.