1 resultado para Ethical guidelines
em SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Aquatic Commons (25)
- Archive of European Integration (22)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (53)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (359)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (10)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (135)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (172)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (2)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (27)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (36)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (14)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
From an ethical perspective, clinical research involving humans is only acceptable if it involves the potential for benefit. Various characteristics can be applied to differentiate research benefit. Often benefit is categorized in direct or indirect benefit, whereby indirect benefit might be further differentiated in collective or benefit for the society, excluding or including the trial patient in the long term. Ethical guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki in its latest version, do not precisely favor a particular type of benefit.