1 resultado para Action to improve the health and wellbeing
em SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (40)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (4)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (31)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (41)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (17)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (19)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (7)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (83)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (21)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (5)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (50)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (13)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (15)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (23)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (11)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (52)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (130)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (52)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Background: Physician-rating websites have become a popular tool to create more transparency about the quality of health care providers. So far, it remains unknown whether online-based rating websites have the potential to contribute to a better standard of care. Objective: Our goal was to examine which health care providers use online rating websites and for what purposes, and whether health care providers use online patient ratings to improve patient care. Methods: We conducted an online-based cross-sectional study by surveying 2360 physicians and other health care providers (September 2015). In addition to descriptive statistics, we performed multilevel logistic regression models to ascertain the effects of providers' demographics as well as report card-related variables on the likelihood that providers implement measures to improve patient care. Results: Overall, more than half of the responding providers surveyed (54.66%, 1290/2360) used online ratings to derive measures to improve patient care (implemented measures: mean 3.06, SD 2.29). Ophthalmologists (68%, 40/59) and gynecologists (65.4%, 123/188) were most likely to implement any measures. The most widely implemented quality measures were related to communication with patients (28.77%, 679/2360), the appointment scheduling process (23.60%, 557/2360), and office workflow (21.23%, 501/2360). Scaled-survey results had a greater impact on deriving measures than narrative comments. Multilevel logistic regression models revealed medical specialty, the frequency of report card use, and the appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-survey ratings to be significantly associated predictors for implementing measures to improve patient care because of online ratings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that online ratings displayed on physician-rating websites have an impact on patient care. Despite the limitations of our study and unintended consequences of physician-rating websites, they still may have the potential to improve patient care.