1 resultado para inclusive pedagogy
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (14)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (4)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (35)
- Brock University, Canada (43)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (124)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (35)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (15)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Harvard University (23)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (18)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (35)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (186)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (59)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Michigan (75)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
In order to determine how consistent feedback is within the English Cégep system, this study explores three key aspects of feedback provided to students: the amount of feedback provided, the nature of the feedback according to the defined criteria, and the relative importance of the three categories. Twenty-three teachers in four English departments participated in the study. Data was collected from a detailed questionnaire to give some context in terms of teacher training, experience, and assessment practices. Respondents were then asked to provide written feedback on a sample student essay. Their comments werw analysed in terms of the nature of the feedback, how consistent that feedback was between teachers, and how closely the feedback reflected the stated instructional objectives.