1 resultado para Epistolary fiction, English.
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (4)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (17)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (9)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (17)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (19)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (18)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (3)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (13)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (9)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (9)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (29)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (158)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (235)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (201)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (25)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (38)
- University of Michigan (39)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (17)
Resumo:
In order to determine how consistent feedback is within the English Cégep system, this study explores three key aspects of feedback provided to students: the amount of feedback provided, the nature of the feedback according to the defined criteria, and the relative importance of the three categories. Twenty-three teachers in four English departments participated in the study. Data was collected from a detailed questionnaire to give some context in terms of teacher training, experience, and assessment practices. Respondents were then asked to provide written feedback on a sample student essay. Their comments werw analysed in terms of the nature of the feedback, how consistent that feedback was between teachers, and how closely the feedback reflected the stated instructional objectives.