1 resultado para land use dynamics
em Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London.
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (9)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (116)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (94)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (46)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (21)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Duke University (7)
- Ecology and Society (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (12)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (25)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (24)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (29)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (77)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (6)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (62)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (16)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (13)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (20)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (110)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Washington (2)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.