1 resultado para Land use, Rural Australia Planning
em Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London.
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (8)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (19)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (79)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (69)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (34)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (17)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (8)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (2)
- Harvard University (55)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (77)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (7)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (21)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (3)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (23)
- Universidade do Minho (9)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (13)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (29)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (95)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (71)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.