1 resultado para Consortial Implementations
em Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London.
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (20)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (10)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (37)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (14)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (25)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (34)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (22)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (62)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (3)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (31)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (9)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (24)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (47)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (32)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (10)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (106)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade do Minho (8)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (9)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (25)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (14)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (21)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Context: Obfuscation is a common technique used to protect software against mali- cious reverse engineering. Obfuscators manipulate the source code to make it harder to analyze and more difficult to understand for the attacker. Although different ob- fuscation algorithms and implementations are available, they have never been directly compared in a large scale study. Aim: This paper aims at evaluating and quantifying the effect of several different obfuscation implementations (both open source and commercial), to help developers and project manager to decide which one could be adopted. Method: In this study we applied 44 obfuscations to 18 subject applications covering a total of 4 millions lines of code. The effectiveness of these source code obfuscations has been measured using 10 code metrics, considering modularity, size and complexity of code. Results: Results show that some of the considered obfuscations are effective in mak- ing code metrics change substantially from original to obfuscated code, although this change (called potency of the obfuscation) is different on different metrics. In the pa- per we recommend which obfuscations to select, given the security requirements of the software to be protected.