1 resultado para Catalogs and collections
em Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London.
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Rhode Island School of Design (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (66)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (59)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (19)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (12)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (9)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (14)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (43)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (14)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (23)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (105)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (111)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (73)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (15)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Michigan (106)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Dependence clusters are (maximal) collections of mutually dependent source code entities according to some dependence relation. Their presence in software complicates many maintenance activities including testing, refactoring, and feature extraction. Despite several studies finding them common in production code, their formation, identification, and overall structure are not well understood, partly because of challenges in approximating true dependences between program entities. Previous research has considered two approximate dependence relations: a fine-grained statement-level relation using control and data dependences from a program’s System Dependence Graph and a coarser relation based on function-level controlflow reachability. In principal, the first is more expensive and more precise than the second. Using a collection of twenty programs, we present an empirical investigation of the clusters identified by these two approaches. In support of the analysis, we consider hybrid cluster types that works at the coarser function-level but is based on the higher-precision statement-level dependences. The three types of clusters are compared based on their slice sets using two clustering metrics. We also perform extensive analysis of the programs to identify linchpin functions – functions primarily responsible for holding a cluster together. Results include evidence that the less expensive, coarser approaches can often be used as e�ective proxies for the more expensive, finer-grained approaches. Finally, the linchpin analysis shows that linchpin functions can be e�ectively and automatically identified.