2 resultados para external leadership
em Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal
Resumo:
This thesis analyses the concept of Political Will, suggests its operationalization and establishes a typological theory that provides the necessary support for the diverse strategies of action of a leader. It claims that political leadership styles articulate a choice of action that results from the Political Will of a leader, which is determined by his intention and his discerned possibilities to act. One main research question guided our research: How does a political leader select and change his leadership style? The most illustrative literature on political leadership is reviewed and the characteristics of democratic governance are analyzed. This is followed by an overview of the most noteworthy theories on the theme and a claim for the need of concept coherence, given the multiplicity of the existent standpoints. After that, we concentrate on leadership styles, with a focus on the local governance context. Human action and intentionality are addressed with particular attention, as well as the motivational drivers for action, in order to advance a conceptualization of Political Will through two dimensions: intention and possibility. This analysis led to a number of relevant propositions: (1) Political Will ‘exists’ when the agent has the intent and the possibility to act; (2) these two dimensions ‘translate’ simultaneously what the agent believes he must do and can do; (3) Intention and possibility reflect diverse but limited worldviews; (4) political leadership styles result from the agent’s Political Will; (5) different combinations of the expected and actual worldviews result in different leadership styles; and (6) political leadership styles can change accordingly to several strategies which allow conformity or reflect reaction to worldviews. We suggested the operationalization of the two dimensions of Political Will through the analytical tool of Grid-group Theory, which provided the identification of the heuristic devices that allowed further comprehension on the subjectivity of the agent’s choice. Four standard property spaces – representing four types of leadership styles – result from a preliminary approach to this process. Afterwards, and because these dimensions operate simultaneously, we advance on the analysis and suggest some plausible heuristical conflicts to happen and describe which consequences, strategies and type migrations are conceivable. An inclusive and more complete set of resulting property spaces renders fourteen different types of leadership styles and sixty different predictable causal paths that result from the expected migration strategies. Case-studies were conducted as plausibility probes designed to provide improvements to our theoretical claims and addressed the cases we selected for research purposes: Portuguese Mayors. The findings from five case studies are discussed and the probable impact and congruence of each with the theoretical claims are assessed. The communalities of the causal mechanisms related to the function of intention and possibility as the dimensions of Political Will and their role in explaining different leadership styles are, finally, addressed. To conclude, we advance some repercussions, mainly in the public policies field of research, and suggest a number of different and necessary paths for further work.
Resumo:
A gestão de conhecimento é crucial para a competitividade sustentável das organizações. Todavia, a gestão do conhecimento nos centros de investigação universitários tem sido alvo de uma parca atenção nas práticas destas instituições e a literatura sobre este tema também é escassa. O objetivo deste estudo é o de identificar as barreiras e os facilitadores em quatro processos de conhecimento (aquisição; criação; partilha; transferência de conhecimento), em centros de investigação universitários. Foi feito um estudo exploratório, sendo realizadas vinte e uma entrevistas a diretores, investigadores principais e investigadores juniores, em sete centros de investigação, em duas universidades portuguesas. Os resultados obtidos são: a) as principais barreiras mencionadas pelos participantes são: fraco capital social organizacional interno; deficientes mecanismos de implementação da estratégia nacional; fraco capital social/relacional individual; fraca cultura orientada para os resultados.b) os principais facilitadores mencionados são: forte capital social organizacional externo; forte capital social organizacional interno; boas práticas de formação; forte cultura organizacional orientada para os resultados e adequada estratégia nacional. Em síntese, o estudo sugere que as variáveis de natureza individual e socioorganizacional são relevantes para a produção de conhecimento nestas organizações. A liderança dos centros de investigação tem que ter em linha de conta estes fatores críticos. Adicionalmente não pode descurar o alinhamento das tecnologias com os processos de conhecimento, visto estas serem considerados um suporte do trabalho dos investigadores. Porque as organizações são entidades porosas, é necessário ainda uma liderança atenta aos fatores contextuais para que a gestão do conhecimento seja eficaz.