Virtual Mobility and Learning for PhD students of six European Countries: students’ programme evaluation

In this paper, the authors, as teachers of the Virtual Mobility and Learning ERASMUS Intensive Programme (VML–IP), put forward an analysis of the student’s final evaluation of the Programme as to the most important competences they have developed. In terms of methodology, this study has an exploratory and descriptive nature; hence, being based on empiric evidence. Thus, in the last face-to-face session, students were asked by the Programme’s coordination to present an overall evaluation of their experience in the VML–IP. Data were collected in loco, i.e. through the posters created by each group, as well as the video of the students’ oral presentations. They were later analysed using content analysis as data analysis technique. The results unveil that, although the main goal was fulfilled – i.e. to be able to design and implement a course on a ‘Virtual Mobility and Learning’ topic underpinned by solid theoretical background in the area –, the fact is that every group also pointed out several soft competences as a very important part of their experiences, and crucial for their development as students and future professionals.

Consciência cultural crítica numa comunidade virtual educativa de línguas

A difusão das tecnologias da informação e comunicação fomenta mudanças qualitativas nas práticas pedagógicas, proporcionando a criação de comunidades de aprendizagem entre aprendentes de diferentes pontos do mundo. Tendo como referência a pedagogia crítica para a emancipação (Freire, 1997; Giroux, 1997), este estudo analisou de que forma aprendentes de diferentes proveniências linguístico-culturais desenvolvem a sua consciência cultural crítica (Byram, 1997), quando colocados em situação de trabalho colaborativo on-line, formando uma comunidade de aprendizagem, através do recurso a uma plataforma especialmente concebida para o efeito, a 2ndschool.eu, na qual foram levados a desenvolver um trabalho de natureza interdisciplinar. Pretendíamos que esta plataforma fomentasse questionamentos por parte dos seus membros. Como tal, integrámos diferentes instrumentos de comunicação eletrónica (chat, fóruns e e-mail), através dos quais se promoveu a interação entre os participantes no projeto, alunos e professores (de diversas áreas disciplinares) do Ensino Secundário belga, búlgaro, grego, polaco, português e sueco, com vista à realização de uma tarefa comum: a edição de um trabalho de projeto de análise crítica de reportagens, artigos de opinião e fotos de jornais acerca de tópicos da atualidade nacional e/ou internacional. Tivemos em conta uma metodologia de investigação mais orientada para o estudo de caso e análise do discurso. Para tal, recorremos a dois tipos de instrumentos de recolha de dados: as impressões das discussões estabelecidas através de chat, fóruns, blogs e wikis e os resultados de três questionários sobre o perfil sociolinguístico e cultural dos participantes, a avaliação da plataforma virtual e o inventário de estratégias mais eficazes na negociação de saberes estabelecida. Concluímos que os alunos (re)constroem saberes, pois revelam representações que têm acerca de situações-problema, refletem acerca das mesmas e, posteriormente, disseminam ativamente pontos de vista críticos através de ferramentas Web 2.0, como forma de as resolver. Enquanto verdadeiros pronetários, foram capazes de recorrer a estratégias de comunicação que fomentam a busca de entendimento com o Outro, num caminho oscilante entre o concordar e o discordar, entre o ajudar e o solicitar ajuda, entre o opinar e o escutar, entre o avaliar e o ser avaliado e entre o corrigir e o ser corrigido. Identificámos como principais limitações do nosso estudo a dificuldade de análise das práticas interdisciplinares dos interlocutores internacionais, a desmotivação de alguns aprendentes nas tarefas e ainda o reduzido recurso ao videochat, pelo desconforto no seu uso. Por isso, consideramos que futuras investigações deverão debruçar-se nestas questões.

The impact of communication disability on quality of life of people with aphasia and their caregivers

Aphasia is a chronic acquired communication disorder that may change people with aphasia (PWA) and their caregivers’ lives for ever. Social and emotional changes are frequently reported by both, although the impact of these changes in quality of life (QOL) needs further research. This study identifies predictors and variables that influence PWA’s and their caregivers’ QOL and social relationships (SR). A cross-sectional descriptive, correlational and comparative study was undertaken with 255 individuals from Portuguese general population (mean age 43 years, range 25-84 years; 148 females, 107 males), 25 PWA (mean age 54 years, range 20-71; 12 females and 13 males), and 25 caregivers (mean age 51 years, range 26-73; 17 females and 8 males). All the participants completed the World Health Quality of Life Bref instrument, the SR domain of the World Health Organization Quality of Life – 100 scale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Participants with aphasia completed the Lisbon Aphasia Assessment Battery, Barthel Index, Frenchay Activities Index, Communication Disability Profile and the Modified Mini-Mental State which evaluated language disability, aphasia coefficient, activities, participation and cognition. In addition, caregivers completed the Carers’ Assessment of Managing Index to assess coping strategies. PWA and their caregivers are less satisfied with their QOL and SR than Portuguese general population; whereas PWA have the worse QOL and SR. Thus, aphasia seems to impact negatively in their QOL and SR. Emotional status has great importance for QOL and SR among the three groups. PWA’s activities and participation have great impact in both PWA’s and caregivers’ QOL and SR. Additionally, emotional status and participation are the best predictors of PWA’s QOL. Along with these two variables, activities of the PWA are the best predictors of caregivers’ QOL. Participation is the best predictor of PWA’s SR; emotional status and number of cohabitants are best predictors for caregivers’ SR. Aphasia assessment and intervention should take into account all the factors that influence PWA’s and caregivers’ QOL and SR so the central goal of enhancing it can be achieved. These results are important for identifying and planning support needs and are useful in the orientation of the activities carried out by the service providers allowing the adjustment of health programs and policies based on people’s real life needs.