The player and video game interplay in the gameplay experience construct

Among the many discussions and studies related to video games, one of the most recurrent, widely debated and important relates to the experience of playing video games. The gameplay experience – as appropriated in this study – is the result of the interplay between two essential elements: a video game and a player. Existing studies have explored the resulting experience of video game playing from the perspective of the video game or the player, but none appear to equally balance both of these elements. The study presented here contributes to the ongoing debate with a gameplay experience model. The proposed model, which looks to equally balance the video game and the player elements, considers the gameplay experience to be both an interactive experience (related to the process of playing the video game) and an emotional experience (related to the outcome of playing the video game). The mutual influence of these two experiences during video game play ultimately defines the gameplay experience. To this gameplay experience contributes several dimensions, related to both the video game and player: the video game includes a mechanics, interface and narrative dimension; the player includes a motivations, expectations and background dimension. Also, the gameplay experience is initially defined by a gameplay situation, conditioned by an ambient in which gameplay takes place and a platform on which the video game is played. In order to initially validate the proposed model and attempt to show a relationship among the multiple model dimensions, a multi-case study was carried out using two different video games and player samples. In one study, results show significant correlations between multiple model dimensions, and evidence that video game related changes influence player motivations as well as player visual behavior. In specific player related analysis, results show that while players may be different in terms of background and expectations regarding the game, their motivation to play are not necessarily different, even if their performance in the game is weak. While further validation is necessary, this model not only contributes to the gameplay experience debate, but also demonstrates in a given context how player and video game dimensions evolve during video game play.

Dissecting the role of Profilin-1 in microglial cell function: the impact on ROS production

Microglial cells are the resident immune cells of central nervous system (CNS) and the major players in neuroinflammation. These cells are also responsible for surveilling the neuronal microenvironment, and upon injury to the CNS they change their morphology and molecular profile and become activated. Activated status is associated with microglia proliferation, migration to injury foci, increased phagocytic capacity, production and release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytokines (pro- or anti-inflammatory) and reactive nitrogen species. Microglia activation is crucial for tissue repair in the healthy brain. However, their chronic activation or deregulation might contribute for the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying microglial cell activation is important for defining targets and develop appropriate therapeutic strategies to control the chronic activation of microglia. It has been observed an increase in profilin (Pfn) mRNA in microglial cells in the rat hippocampus after unilateral ablation of its major extrinsic input, the entorhinal cortex. This observation suggested that Pfn might be involved in microglia activation. Pfn1 is an actin binding protein that controls assembly and disassembly of actin filaments and is important for several cellular processes, including, motility, cell proliferation and survival. Here, we studied the role of Pfn1 in microglial cell function. For that, we used primary cortical microglial cell cultures and microglial cell lines in which we knocked down Pfn1 expression and assessed the activation status of microglia, based on classical activation markers, such as: phagocytosis, glutamate release, reactive oxygen species (ROS), pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. We demonstrated that Pfn1 (i) is more active in hypoxia-challenged microglia, (ii) modulates microglia pro- and anti-inflammatory signatures and (iii) plays a critical role in ROS generation in microglia. Altogether, we conclude that Pfn1 is a key protein for microglia homeostasis, playing an essential role in their activation, regardless the polarization into a pro or anti-inflammatory signature.