Effect of photodynamic therapy on the virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus are Gram-positive bacteria who integrate the human microbiota. Nevertheless, these bacteria can be pathogenic to the humans. Due to the increasing occurrence of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus new approaches to control this pathogen are necessary. The antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation process (PDI) is based in the combined use of a light source, an oxidizing agent like oxygen and an intermediary agent (a photosensitizer). These three components interact to form cytotoxic reactive oxygen species that irreversibly damage vital constituents of the microbial cells and ultimately lead to cell death. In fact, PDI is being shown to be a promising alternative to the antibiotic approach in the inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms. However, information on effects of photosensitization on particular virulence factors is strikingly scarce. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of PDI on virulence factors of S. aureus. For this, as photosensitizer the 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-iodide (Tetra-Py+-Me) and six strains of S. aureus (one reference strain, one strain with 1 enterotoxin, two strains with 3 enterotoxins and two strains resistant to methicillin, MRSA – one with 5 enterotoxins and the other without enterotoxins) were used. The effect of photosensitization on catalase activity, beta hemolysis, lipases, thermonuclease, enterotoxins, coagulase production and resistance to methicillin was assessed. The results indicate that the expression of some virulence factors in the cells subjected to this therapy is affected. Additionally the susceptibility of the strains to PDI did not decrease upon successive treatments.

Inactivation of Pseudomonas spp. biofilms with natural and synthetic photossensitizers

Cationic porphyrins have been widely used as photosensitizers (PSs) in the inactivation of microorganisms, both in biofilms and in planktonic forms. However, the application of curcumin, a natural PS, in the inactivation of biofilms, is poorly studied. The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate and compare the efficiency of a cationic porphyrin tetra (Tetra-Py+-Me) and curcumin in the photodynamic inactivation of biofilms of Pseudomonas spp and the corresponding planktonic form; (2) to evaluate the effect of these PSs in cell adhesion and biofilm maturation. In eradication assays, biofilms of Pseudomonas spp adherent to silicone tubes were subjected to irradiation with white light (180 J cm-2) in presence of different concentrations (5 and 10 μM) of PS. In colonization experiments, solid supports were immersed in cell suspensions, PS was added and the mixture experimental setup was irradiated (864 J cm-2) during the adhesion phase. After transference solid supports to new PS-containing medium, irradiation (2592 J cm-2) was resumed during biofilm maturation. The assays of inactivation of planktonic cells were conducted in cell suspensions added of PS concentrations equivalent to those used in experiments with biofilms. The inactivation of planktonic cells and biofilms (eradication and colonization assays) was assessed by quantification of viable cells after plating in solid medium, at the beginning and at the end of the experiments. The results show that porphyrin Tetra-Py+-Me effectively inactivated planktonic cells (3.7 and 3.0 log) and biofilms of Pseudomonas spp (3.2 and 3.6 log). In colonization assays, the adhesion of cells was attenuated in 2.2 log, and during the maturation phase, a 5.2 log reduction in the concentration of viable cells was observed. Curcumin failed to cause significant inactivation in planktonic cells (0.7 and 0.9 log) and for that reason it was not tested in biofilm eradication assays. In colonization assays, curcumin did not affect the adhesion of cells to the solid support and caused a very modest reduction (1.0 log) in the concentration of viable cells during the maturation phase. The results confirm that the photodynamic inactivation is a promising strategy to control installed biofilms and in preventing colonization. Curcumin, however, does not represent an advantageous alternative to porphyrins in the case of biofilms of Pseudomonas spp.