1 resultado para quanto option
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (22)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (7)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (94)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (8)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (3)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (10)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (7)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (35)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (221)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (28)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (136)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (71)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- Sistema UNA-SUS (7)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade do Minho (7)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (10)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (27)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (12)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (12)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (61)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
The provision of physical and social infrastructure in the form of roads, green spaces and community facilities has traditionally been provided for by the state through the general taxation system. However, as the state has been transformed along more neoliberal lines, the private sector is increasingly relied upon to deliver public goods and services. Planning gain agreements have flourished within this context by offering another vehicle through which local facilities are privately funded. Whilst these agreements reflect the broader dynamics of neoliberalism, they are commonly viewed as a tool which can be employed to challenge these very dynamics by empowering local communities to secure more just planning outcomes. This paper counters such claims. Based on evidence gathered from 80 interviews with planners, councillors, developers and community groups in Ireland, the paper demonstrates how planning gain agreements have been strategically redeployed by the holders of political and economic power to serve their own ends. In seeking to understand why and how this has occurred, specific consideration is given to the changing power dynamics between the state and private capital under neoliberalism. The paper highlights how institutional arrangements have enabled developers to infiltrate the political sphere in more subtle and implicit ways than ever before. We conclude by arguing that planning gain must be understood as a mechanism which has been manipulated in ways which essentially work to preserve and enhance, rather than redress, existing power imbalances in the planning system by facilitating large scale transfers of wealth upwards in society.