Peptide Therapeutics and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Barriers Encountered Translating from the Laboratory to Patients

Peptides are receiving increasing interest as clinical therapeutics. These highly tunable molecules can be tailored to biocompatibility and biodegradability with simultaneously selective and potent therapeutic effects. Despite challenges regarding up-scaling and licensing of peptide products, their vast clinical potential is reflected in the 60 plus peptide-based therapeutics already on the market, and the further 500 derivatives currently in developmental stages. Peptides are proving effective for a multitude of disease states including: type 2 diabetes (controlled using the licensed glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor liraglutide); irritable bowel syndrome managed with linaclotide (currently at approval stages); acromegaly (treated with octapeptide somostatin analogues lanreotide and octreotide); selective or broad spectrum microbicidal agents such as the Gram-positive selective PTP-7 and antifungal heliomicin; anticancer agents including goserelin used as either adjuvant or for prostate and breast cancer,and the first marketed peptide derived vaccine against prostate cancer, sipuleucel-T. Research is also focusing on improving the biostability of peptides. This is achieved through a number of mechanisms ranging from replacement of naturally occurring L-amino acid enantiomers with D-amino acid forms, lipidation, peptidomimetics, N-methylation, cyclization and exploitation of carrier systems. The development of self-assembling peptides are paving the way for sustained release peptide formulations and already two such licensed examples exist, lanreotide and octreotide. The versatility and tunability of peptide-based products is resulting in increased translation of peptide therapies, however significant challenges remain with regard to their wider implementation. This review highlights some of the notable peptide therapeutics discovered to date and the difficulties encountered by the pharmaceutica lindustry in translating these molecules to the clinical setting for patient benefit, providing some possible solutions to the most challenging barriers. 

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor insensitivity of non-cycling CD34+ human acute myeloid leukaemia cells with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutations.

The efficacy of tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors on non-cycling acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cells, previously shown to have potent tumourigenic potential, is unknown. This pilot study describes the first attempt to characterize non-cycling cells from a small series of human FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation positive samples. CD34+ AML cells from patients with FLT3 mutation positive AML were cultured on murine stroma. In expansion cultures, non-cycling cells were found to retain CD34+ expression in contrast to dividing cells. Leukaemic gene rearrangements could be detected in non-cycling cells, indicating their leukaemic origin. Significantly, the FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation was found in the non-cycling fraction of four out of five cases. Exposure to the FLT3-directed inhibitor TKI258 clearly inhibited the growth of AML CD34+ cells in short-term cultures and colony-forming unit assays. Crucially, non-cycling cells were not eradicated, with the exception of one case, which exhibited exquisite sensitivity to the compound. Moreover, in longer-term cultures, TKI258-treated non-cycling cells showed no growth impairment compared to treatment-naive non-cycling cells. These findings suggest that non-cycling cells in AML may constitute a disease reservoir that is resistant to TK inhibition. Further studies with a larger sample size and other inhibitors are warranted.